Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 3478
Aemei v. Switzerland
Aemei v. Switzerland CAT/C/18/D/34/1995 Communication number s : 034/1995 Author: Seid Mortesa Aemei Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Switzerland Submission date 26 Oct 1995 Date of decision 09 May 1997 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/18/D/34/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/256/en-US
Aheyeu v. Belarus
Aheyeu v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2862/2016 Communication number s : 2862/2016 Author: Aleh Aheyeu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 19 Aug 2016 Date of decision 15 Jul 2021 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2862/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3188/en-US
Akhadov v. Kyrgyzstan
Akhadov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/101/D/1503/2006 Communication number s : 1503/2006 Author: Otabek Akhadov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 18 Oct 2006 Date of decision 25 Mar 2011 Comment: The text of an JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1503/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1610/en-US
Aleksandr Komarovsky v. Belarus
Aleksandr Komarovsky v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1839/2008 Communication number s : 1839/2008 Author: Aleksandr Komarovksy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 07 Aug 2008 Date of decision 25 Oct 2013 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1839/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1793/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009 Communication number s : 1873/2009 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Russian Federation Submission date 25 Mar 2009 Date of decision 25 Oct 2013 JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1873/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1686/en-US
Ali v. Tunisia
Ali v. Tunisia CAT/C/41/D/291/2006 Communication number s : 291/2006 Author: Saadia Ali Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 Mar 2006 Date of decision 21 Nov 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/41/D/291/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/71/en-US
Althammer et al. (2) v. Austria
Althammer et al. 2 v. Austria CCPR/C/78/D/998/2001 Communication number s : 998/2001 Author: Rupert Althammer et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Austria Submission date 22 Apr 1998 Date of decision 08 Aug 2003 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/998/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1054/en-US
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan
Anna Belousova v. Kazakhstan CEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012 Communication number s : 045/2012 Author: Anna Belousova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Sep 2012 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/45/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2053/en-US
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland
Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/710/2015 Communication number s : 710/2015 Author: Aref Mohammed Abdulkarim represented by counsel Mr. Tarig Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date JUTBCAT/C/62/D/710/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2405/en-US
Arellano Medina v. Ecuador
Arellano Medina v. Ecuador E/C.12/63/D/7/2015 Communication number s : 007/2015 Author: Jaime Efra n Arellano Medina Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 63 Country Ecuador Submission date 24 Apr 2015 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/63/D/7/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2408/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain
Asmae Taghzouti et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 056/2018 Author: Asmae Taghzouti Ezqouihel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Spain Submission date 21 Sep 2018 Date of decision 22 Feb 2021 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/69/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2922/en-US
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden,Türkiye
Aytulun and Guclu v. Sweden T rkiye CAT/C/45/D/373/2009 Communication number s : 373/2009 Author: Munir Aytulun and Lilav Guclu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Sweden T rkiye Submission date 27 Jan 2009 Date of decision 19 Nov JUTBCAT/C/45/D/373/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/61/en-US
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
B.J. v. Denmark
B.J. v. Denmark CERD/C/56/D/17/1999 Communication number s : 17/1999 Author: B.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Jul 1999 Date of decision 17 Mar 2000 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/56/D/17/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3026/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/273/1988 Communication number s : 273/1988 Author: B.d.B. G.B. C.J.K. L.P.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Jan 1988 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/273/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/427/en-US
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 NULL 2013 12 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BLR/CO/4 6 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 13 December 2013 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BLR/CO/4-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/92696eeb-1674-49e1-befc-fa63611f61d8
BOCOS-CUESTA v. the Netherlands
BOCOS CUESTA v. the Netherlands NLD 10/02/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the impossibility for the accused to question pre trial statements given by minors EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4527