Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1021 - 1040 of 1311
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US
J.P. v. Canada
J.P. v. Canada CCPR/C/43/D/446/1991 Communication number s : 446/1991 Author: J.P. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 43 Country Canada Submission date 21 Feb 1991 Date of decision 07 Nov 1991 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/43/D/446/1991https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/723/en-US
J.v.K. and C.M.G.v.K.-S. v. Netherlands
J.v.K. and C.M.G.v.K. S. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/45/D/483/1991 Communication number s : 483/1991 Author: J.v.K. and C.M.G.v.K. S. names deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 45 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Nov 1991 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/483/1991https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/751/en-US
JAMAICA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
JAMAICA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/JAM/CO/3 4 NULL 2015 03 09T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/JAM/CO/3 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 10 March 2015 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/JAM/CO/3-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f1fa0c1a-333d-4a22-929b-5f3a599e4e53
JOANNA SZULC v. Poland
JOANNA SZULC v. Poland POL 13/02/2013 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Authorities failure for more than ten years to grant access to all pertinent documents collected by security services: Obstacles of legislative and administrative nature EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39931
KANDARAKIS v. Greece
KANDARAKIS v. Greece GRC 11/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicant lawyers right of access to a court due to the dismissal between 2005 and 2012 by the domestic courts of their requests EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55903
KOSHELEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOSHELEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 17/04/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Right of individual petition. Pressure and intimidation exerted by prosecutors on the applicants following their invitation to the prosecutors offices in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13970
Krausser v. Austria
Krausser v. Austria CCPR/C/76/D/890/1999 Communication number s : 890/1999 Author: Emmerich Krausser Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Austria Submission date 27 Sep 1999 Date of decision 23 Oct 2002 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/890/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/350/en-US
L.A. v. Algeria
L.A. v. Algeria CAT/C/57/D/531/2012 Communication number s : 531/2012 Author: L.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Algeria Submission date 14 Aug 2012 Date of decision 12 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/531/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3006/en-US
L.E. v. Greece
L.E. v. Greece GRC 21/04/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Prohibition of slavery and forced labour: Authorities failures with regard to their positive obligations due to shortcomings in response to criminal complaint of human EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15626
L.R. et al. v. Slovakia
L.R. et al. v. Slovakia CERD/C/66/D/31/2003 Communication number s : 031/2003 Author: L.R. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Slovakia Submission date 05 Aug 2003 Date of decision 07 Mar 2005 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/66/D/31/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1741/en-US
LUXEMBOURG: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LUXEMBOURG: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/LUX/CO/4 NULL 2022 11 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/LUX/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 15 November 2022 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights UHRIE/C.12/LUX/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f37f8eef-ff32-4259-8bf2-1a3a02827613
Lumbala v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Lumbala v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/115/D/2214/2012 Communication number s : 2214/2012 Author: John Jacques Lumbala Tshidika Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission date 13 Aug JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2214/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2046/en-US
MARGUSHIN v. Russia
MARGUSHIN v. Russia RUS 01/07/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty due to the non enforcement of a judgment resulting in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13735
METALCO BT. v. Hungary
METALCO BT. v. Hungary HUN 20/06/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Functioning of justice and protection of property rights: Unlawful interference due to the continued seizure by the tax authorities of the applicant company s share held EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11118
Machado Bartolomeu v. Portugal
Machado Bartolomeu v. Portugal CCPR/C/100/D/1783/2008 Communication number s : 1783/2008 Author: Fernando Machado Bartolomeu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Portugal Submission date 24 Mar 2008 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1783/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1196/en-US
Martínez et al. v. Uruguay
Mart nez et al. v. Uruguay CCPR/C/93/D/1607/2007 Communication number s : 1607/2007 Author: Alfonso Sanjuan Mart nez Myriam Pi eyro Mart nez Patricia Pi eyro Mart nez and Yolanda Filpi Funiciello Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 93 JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1607/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1476/en-US
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus
Natalya Pinchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012 Communication number s : 2165/2012 Author: Natalya Pinchuk represented by counsel Antoine Bernard Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 12 Apr 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2165/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1938/en-US
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222