Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 50
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5878/08 WISTRICH H. GBR 3/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Offences under the Health and Safety at Work ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN 43611/11 LOVEDAY D. SWE 3/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Conditional Iran No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iran ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0323JUD004361111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161829
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 33985/96 33986/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 or 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 or 14 10 Violation of Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003398596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58408
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF UAB AMBERCORE DC AND UAB ARCUS NOVUS v. LITHUANIA 56774/18 SIMAITIS R. LTU 6/13/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005677418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-225220
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
CASE OF X v. LATVIA 27853/09 STRAUSS R. LVA 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138992
Cayzer v. Australia
Cayzer v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017 Communication number s : 2981/2017 Author: Graham Cayzer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2016 Date of decision 25 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3676/en-US
Dauphin v. Canada
Dauphin v. Canada CCPR/C/96/D/1792/2008 Communication number s : 1792/2008 Author: John Micha l Dauphin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Canada Submission date 29 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: Under article 92 of JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1792/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1550/en-US
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark
Fifth Round Evaluation Report on Denmark DNK 2019 06 21 2019 09 04 Adoption: 21.06.2019 Publication: 04.09.2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 8 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)8-Final-eng-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)8-Final-eng-Denmark-PUBLIC
Follow-up report v. Australia,Bosnia and Herzegovina,Morocco,New Zealand,Russian Federation,Spain,Sweden,Switzerland
Follow up report v. Australia Bosnia and Herzegovina Morocco New Zealand Russian Federation Spain Sweden Switzerland CAT/C/71/2 Communication number s : 637/2014 817/2017 852/2017 882/2018 854/2017 818/2017 729/2016 681/2015 Author: Type of decision: JUTBCAT/C/71/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3588/en-US
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada CCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017 Communication number s : 3016/2017 Author: G.P. and G.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Canada Submission date 11 Aug 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3177/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Suriname, Greece and Samoa
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 22 September 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Suriname Greece and Samoa. Martin P. Misiedjan Minister of Justice and Police of Suriname said the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-suriname
J.Y. v. France
J.Y. v. France CCPR/C/131/D/2944/2017 Communication number s : 2944/2017 Author: J.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country France Submission date 31 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Mar 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2944/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3250/en-US
M.R. v. Denmark
M.R. v. Denmark CCPR/C/133/D/2510/2014 Communication number s : 2510/2014 Author: M.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Dec 2014 Date of decision 19 Oct 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/2510/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3163/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
NEW ZEALAND: REPORT ON SPT VISIT
NEW ZEALAND: REPORT ON SPT VISIT CAT/OP/NZL/1 NULL 2017 02 10T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/NZL/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 10 February 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English English French and UHRICAT/OP/NZL/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d72e29f6-898e-47f3-8956-03b4eedecf31