Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 54
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum’a et al v. Libya
A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al v. Libya CCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010 Communication number s : 1958/2010 Author: A.M.H. El Hojouj Jum a et al Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1958/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1849/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
Berzig v. Algeria
Berzig v. Algeria CCPR/C/103/D/1781/2008 Communication number s : 1781/2008 Author: Fatma Zohra Berzig Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Feb 2008 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1781/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1645/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF AZIMOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF AZIMOV v. RUSSIA 67474/11 RYABININA Y. TRENINA D. RUS 4/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Tajikistan Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0418JUD006747411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-118605
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF KHUSNUTDINOV AND X v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHUSNUTDINOV AND X v. RUSSIA 76598/12 PIGOLEVA D. RUS 12/18/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD007659812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188362
CASE OF KISLOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KISLOV v. RUSSIA 3598/10 RUS 7/9/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Take proceedings Violation of Article 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0709JUD000359810https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194311
CASE OF OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8139/09 PEIRCE G. FITZGERALD E. QC HUSAIN R. QC FRIEDMAN D. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Jordan No violation of Article 3 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE
CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE 43835/11 SHARMA S. RAMBY DE MELLO M. MUMAN T. SINGH JUSS S. FRA 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Actio popularis Preliminary objections dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD004383511https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145466
CASE OF UZBYAKOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF UZBYAKOV v. RUSSIA 71160/13 MARKOV E.V. RUS 5/5/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life 451 634 425 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0505JUD007116013 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0505JUD007116013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202416
Ebenezer Derek Mbongo Akwanga v. Cameroon
Ebenezer Derek Mbongo Akwanga v. Cameroon CCPR/C/101/D/1813/2008 Communication number s : 1813/2008 Author: Ebenezer Derek Mbongo Akwanga Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Cameroon Submission date 20 Jun 2008 Date of decision 22 JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1813/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1625/en-US
First report on the Russian Federation
First report on the Russian Federation RUS 1997 11 28 1999 01 26 Council of EuropeCRI 99 3 European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance First report on the Russian Federation Adopted on 26 January 1999 For further information about the work of the ECRIRUS-CbC-I-1999-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=RUS-CbC-I-1999-003-ENG
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Qatar, Nicaragua and Italy
The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Qatar Nicaragua and Italy. Ahmad Bin Abdullah Al Mahmoud Minister of State for Foreign Affairs of Qatar said Qatar paid significant attention to the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-qatar
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation, Cameroon and Cuba
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON 20 September 2013 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation Cameroon and Cuba. Georgy Matyushkin Representative of the Russian Federation at the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2013/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-russian
Kungurov v. Uzbekistan
Kungurov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/102/D/1478/2006 Communication number s : 1478/2006 Author: Nikolai Kungurov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 17 Mar 2006 Date of decision 20 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1478/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1619/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
Nenova et al. v. Libya
Nenova et al. v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1880/2009 Communication number s : 1880/2009 Author: N.S. Nenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2009 Date of decision 20 Mar 2012 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1880/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1425/en-US