Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 780
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania
ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Lithuania LTU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 03/12/2018 15:46:42 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights on account of the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50865
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
ANGOLA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ANGOLA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/AGO/CO/1 NULL 2023 04 12T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/AGO/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 12 April 2023 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/AGO/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/806aab54-418a-4d88-8915-9fc3a5f0f094
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Agreement on the Transfer of Corpses (ETS No. 080)
Agreement on the Transfer of Corpses ETS No. 080 080 Strasbourg 1973 10 26T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Strasbourg 1975 11 11T00:00:00 3 Ratifications. The Agreement provides for the COEETS No. 080https://rm.coe.int/168007617d
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BRAZIL: REPORT ON SPT VISIT
BRAZIL: REPORT ON SPT VISIT CAT/OP/BRA/3 NULL 2016 02 16T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BRA/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 16 February 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: English English French and Spanish UHRICAT/OP/BRA/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f228c6bb-e0ac-4e18-8282-7544b8ab68a8
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
Berkaoui v. Algeria
Berkaoui v. Algeria CCPR/C/130/D/2639/2015 Communication number s : 2639/2015 Author: Tassadit Berkaoui Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Algeria Submission date 04 Jun 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2639/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3294/en-US
Boutarsa v. Algeria
Boutarsa v. Algeria CCPR/C/135/D/3010/2017 Communication number s : 3010/2017 Author: Naima Boutarsa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Algeria Submission date 26 May 2016 Date of decision 08 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3010/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3438/en-US
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A. v. NORWAY 28070/06 DANIELSEN P. NOR 4/9/2009 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award 238 310 354 451 429 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD002807006 FIRST SECTION CASE OF A. v. NORWAY Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD002807006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92137