Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 301
A.M. v. Australia
A.M. v. Australia CRPD/C/13/D/12/2013 Communication number s : 012/2013 Author: Australian Centre for Disability Law Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 13 Country Australia Submission date 18 Apr 2013 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 JUTBCRPD/C/13/D/12/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2009/en-US
AL-JEDDA v. the United Kingdom
AL JEDDA v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Internment of an Iraqi civilian in Iraq: preventive detention without basis in law of an Iraqi national from 2004 to 2007 in a detention centre run by British EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2923
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ALLIANCE CAPITAL (LUXEMBOURG) SA v. Luxemburg
ALLIANCE CAPITAL LUXEMBOURG SA v. Luxemburg LUX 18/04/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court on account of a material error made by the Court of Cassation subsequently EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-129
ARRAS AND OTHERS v. Italy
ARRAS AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 14/05/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Retroactive legislative interference in litigation between private parties without compelling reason of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28252
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
BALASA v. Romania
BALASA v. Romania ROU 20/07/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Lack of a fair trial and partial non enforcement of a property title without compensation Status of Execution: Reopening of proceedings possible. As concerns the property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17510
BERECZKI v. Romania
BERECZKI v. Romania ROU 26/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of impartiality of the county court which had examined and dismissed in 2007 the administrative action brought by the applicant against the judicial experts office on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13167
BRADEAN AND OTHERS v. Romania
BRADEAN AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 21/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicants right of access to court on account of the requalification of an action in tort into an action in administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62931
BUNTOV v. Russia
BUNTOV v. Russia RUS 09/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases in this group mainly concern torture and ill treatment inflicted in the penitentiary facilities and their ineffective investigation substantive and procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14152
Ben Salem v. Tunisia
Ben Salem v. Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/269/2005 Communication number s : 269/2005 Author: Ali Ben Salem Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 May 2005 Date of decision 07 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/39/D/269/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/87/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF ŞAHİN ÇAĞDAŞ v. TURKEY
CASE OF AH N A DA v. TURKEY 28137/02 CETINKAYA S. TUR 4/11/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award Convention ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0411JUD002813702https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-73158
CASE OF AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF AHMET H SREV ALTAN v. TURKEY 13252/17 ALBUGA ALIKU U F. TUR 4/13/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0413JUD001325217https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-209444
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AIR CANADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 18465/91 N/A GBR 5/5/1995 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 6 1 Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 sections 139 1 and 5 141 1 142 152 Schedule 3 paras. 6 7 and 16 1952 Act on customs 1876 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0505JUD001846591https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57939
CASE OF AIREY v. IRELAND
CASE OF AIREY v. IRELAND 6289/73 N/A IRL 10/9/1979 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 8 Just satisfaction reserved 14 128 445 136 41 164 343 100 451 425 203 444 110 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:1009JUD000628973 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF AIREY v. IRELAND ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:1009JUD000628973https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57420