Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 10 of 10
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUAMAR v. BELGIUM 9106/80 N/A BEL 2/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 5 4 Just satisfaction reserved Children s and Young Persons Welfare Act of 8 April 1965 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0229JUD000910680https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57445
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE
CASE OF BOZANO v. FRANCE 9990/82 N/A FRA 12/18/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 5 1 and P4 2 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:1218JUD000999082https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57448
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BROGAN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 11209/84 11234/84 11266/84 11386/85 N/A GBR 11/29/1988 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 3 Violation of Art. 5 5 No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1129JUD001120984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57450
CASE OF CHITAYEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF CHITAYEV v. RUSSIA 59334/00 Lawyers of Stichting Russian Justice Initiative RUS 1/18/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD005933400https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-79109
CASE OF FOX, CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FOX CAMPBELL AND HARTLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 12244/86 12245/86 12383/86 N/A GBR 8/30/1990 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 2 Violation of Art. 5 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 5 4 and 13 Just satisfaction reserved 1978 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0830JUD001224486https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57721
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF KEUS v. THE NETHERLANDS 12228/86 N/A NLD 10/25/1990 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 5 2 No violation of Art. 5 4 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 3 Netherlands Criminal Code Article 37 448 228 459 456 220 307 351 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001222886https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57637
CASE OF KOLOMPAR v. BELGIUM
CASE OF KOLOMPAR v. BELGIUM 11613/85 N/A BEL 9/24/1992 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 5 1 No violation of Art. 5 4 14 128 448 228 456 220 135 481 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001161385 COURT CHAMBER CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0924JUD001161385https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57742
CASE OF NIELSEN v. DENMARK
CASE OF NIELSEN v. DENMARK 10929/84 N/A DNK 11/28/1988 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected ratione personae 448 228 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1128JUD001092984 COURT PLENARY CASE OF NIELSEN v. DENMARK Application no. 10929/84 JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 28 November ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1128JUD001092984https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57545
CASE OF WEEKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF WEEKS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 9787/82 N/A GBR 3/2/1987 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 4 No violation of Art. 5 1 Just satisfaction reserved Criminal Justice Act 1967 Sections 61 62 448 220 228 297 339 456 459 481 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0302JUD000978782 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0302JUD000978782https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57594