Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 105
16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 16. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance New York 20 December 2006 Entry into force : 23 December 2010 in accordance with article 39 1 which UNIV-16https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-16&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
Aboufaied v. Libya
Aboufaied v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008 Communication number s : 1782/2008 Author: Tahar Mohamed Aboufaied Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 05 Apr 2008 Date of decision 21 Mar 2012 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1364/en-US
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM
CASE OF BOUYID v. BELGIUM 23380/09 MARCHAND C CHIHAOUI Z. BEL 9/28/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0928JUD002338009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157670
CASE OF DIJKHUIZEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF DIJKHUIZEN v. THE NETHERLANDS 61591/16 NOOITGEDAGT B.Th. NLD 6/8/2021 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 3 Rights of defence 445 76 136 440 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608JUD006159116https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210486
CASE OF DRĖLINGAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF DR LINGAS v. LITHUANIA 28859/16 N/A LTU 3/12/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nullum crimen sine lege Retroactivity Criminal offence Article 99 of the Lithuanian Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD002885916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191702
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF HIRSI JAMAA AND OTHERS v. ITALY 27765/09 LANA A. G. SACCUCCI A. ITA 2/23/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0223JUD002776509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109231
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF LUČIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF LU I v. CROATIA 5699/11 UMICEVIC M. HRV 2/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 6 3 d Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 3 d Examination of witnesses 445 76 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0227JUD000569911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-141200
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CASE OF MAKTOUF AND DAMJANOVI v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2312/08 34179/08 LOZO A. MEHIC I. BIH 7/18/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Heavier penalty Retroactivity Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0718JUD000231208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122716
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ABDURASULOVIC v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 N/A TUR 2/6/2003 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 as regard the extradition proceedings No separate issue under Art. 6 as regard the other complaints Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0206JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60924
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY
CASE OF MAMATKULOV AND ASKAROV v. TURKEY 46827/99 46951/99 CARSANCAKLI I.S. TUR 2/4/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 2 Inadmissible under Art. 6 concerning the exradition proceedings No violation of Art. 6 1 Failure to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0204JUD004682799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68183
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF RAMADAN v. MALTA
CASE OF RAMADAN v. MALTA 76136/12 REFALO I. GRECH S. MLT 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Articles 14 previously Article 9 27 1 27 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD007613612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163820
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF ALL MIGRANT WORKERS AND MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILIES : GUATEMALA
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF ALL MIGRANT WORKERS AND MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILIES : GUATEMALA CMW/C/GTM/CO/1 NULL 2011 10 18T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/GTM/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: UHRICMW/C/GTM/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/763c3784-079b-4a57-ba70-952883286a10
G.R.B. v. Sweden
G.R.B. v. Sweden CAT/C/20/D/83/1997 Communication number s : 083/1997 Author: G.R.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Sweden Submission date 02 Jun 1997 Date of decision 15 May 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/20/D/83/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/236/en-US
Himal and Devi Sharma v. Nepal
Himal and Devi Sharma v. Nepal CCPR/C/122/D/2265/2013 Communication number s : 2265/2013 Author: Himal and Devi Sharma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2265/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2491/en-US