Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4001 - 4020 of 4177
USLU v. Turkey (no. 2)
USLU v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 20/04/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with private life: Denial of access to doctor s report after examination in prison on grounds of security and public order Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5632
UZBEKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UZBEKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/UZB/CO/4 NULL 2013 12 09T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/UZB/CO/4 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 10 December 2013 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/UZB/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/aa4e72df-1efc-413b-8cf4-16a006f15a0c
UZBEKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
UZBEKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/UZB/CO/5 NULL 2020 01 14T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/UZB/CO/5 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 14 January 2020 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/UZB/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4adc62c3-ff37-44df-8ba8-fadd70b33c00
Ulan Nazaraliev v. Kyrgyzstan
Ulan Nazaraliev v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/126/D/2697/2015 Communication number s : 2697/2015 Author: Ulan Nazaraliev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 30 Nov 2014 Date of decision 05 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2697/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2774/en-US
Umarova v. Uzbekistan
Umarova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/100/D/1449/2006 Communication number s : 1449/2006 Author: Indira Umarova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 20 Jan 2006 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: On 18 April JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1449/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1588/en-US
Urmatbek Akunov v. Kyrgyzstan
Urmatbek Akunov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/118/D/2127/2011 Communication number s : 2127/2011 Author: Urmatbek Akunov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 03 Oct 2011 Date of decision 27 Oct 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2127/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2216/en-US
Usaev v. Russian Federation
Usaev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/99/D/1577/2007 Communication number s : 1577/2007 Author: Adrakhim Usaev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 99 Country Russian Federation Submission date 25 Apr 2007 Date of decision 19 Jul 2010 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1577/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1484/en-US
V.D. v. Romania
V.D. v. Romania ROU 28/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment in detention and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inhuman and degrading treatment in prison due to the failure to provide a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13083
V.R. v. Denmark
V.R. v. Denmark CAT/C/31/D/210/2002 Communication number s : 210/2002 Author: V.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Denmark Submission date 13 Feb 2002 Date of decision 17 Nov 2003 Comment: Pursuant to rule 104 of the Committee s JUTBCAT/C/31/D/210/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/158/en-US
V.S. v. Belarus
V.S. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2182/2012 Communication number s : 2182/2012 Author: V.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 15 Nov 2010 Date of decision 27 Mar 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2182/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2436/en-US
V.X.N. and H.N. v. Sweden
V.X.N. and H.N. v. Sweden CAT/C/24/D/130 131/1999 Communication number s : 131/1999 130/1999 Author: V.X.N. and H.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Feb 1999 Date of decision 15 May 2000 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/24/D/130&131/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/207/en-US
VALASINAS v. Lithuania
VALASINAS v. Lithuania LTU 24/10/2001 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:14:54 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention and protection of private life and correspondence: Inhuman treatment with regard to a body search and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4179
VARNAS v. Lithuania
VARNAS v. Lithuania LTU 09/12/2013 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Discrimination: Unjustified difference in treatment of remand prisoners compared to convicted prisoners as regards conjugal visits. Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4338
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria
VELIKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 04/10/2000 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern mainly deaths ill treatment including torture and lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention or in penitentiary facilities and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3593
VIET NAM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
VIET NAM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/VNM/CO/1 NULL 2018 12 28T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/VNM/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 28 December 2018 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/VNM/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ed43e087-0114-49ca-830f-33783d6c24a9
VIET NAM : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
VIET NAM : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/VNM/CO/3 NULL 2019 08 29T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/VNM/CO/3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 29 August 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/VNM/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/07477f9f-db88-4be7-9277-ceb344a24356
VINCENT v. France
VINCENT v. France FRA 26/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment: Degrading treatment suffered by a paraplegic prisoner in a wheelchair on account of his dependence on other people s availability EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33263
VINTMAN v. Ukraine
VINTMAN v. Ukraine UKR 23/01/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern an unjustified interference with the applicants right to respect for family life owing to the authorities systematic refusal between 2001 and 2017 to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31610
VISIT TO AUSTRIA - REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION
VISIT TO AUSTRIA REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION A/HRC/42/42/ADD.2 NULL 2019 09 09T00:00:00 WG Mercenaries United Nations UHRIA/HRC/42/42/ADD.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/dbf76260-175d-4775-9a50-f1f750600ca6