Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9001 - 9020 of 9504
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.I. v. Canada,Uzbekistan
T.I. v. Canada Uzbekistan CAT/C/45/D/333/2007 Communication number s : 333/2007 Author: T.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Canada Uzbekistan Submission date 15 Sep 2007 Date of decision 15 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/45/D/333/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/62/en-US
T.J. v. Lithuania
T.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009 Communication number s : 1911/2009 Author: T.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1911/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1329/en-US
T.L.N. v. Norway
T.L.N. v. Norway CCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010 Communication number s : 1942/2010 Author: T.L.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Norway Submission date 11 Dec 2009 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/1942/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1847/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/228/2003 Communication number s : 228/2003 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Mar 2003 Date of decision 18 Nov 2003 Comment: Committee member Mr. Fernando Mari o Men JUTBCAT/C/31/D/228/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/154/en-US
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan
T.V. and A.G. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011 Communication number s : 2044/2011 Author: T.V. and A.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 16 Feb 2009 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2044/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2101/en-US
T.Z. v. Switzerland
T.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/62/D/688/2015 Communication number s : 688/2015 Author: T.Z. represented by counsel Stephanie Motz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Switzerland Submission date 07 Jul 2015 Date of decision 22 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/688/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2334/en-US
T v. Australia
T v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/599/2014 Communication number s : 599/2014 Author: T Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 30 Apr 2014 Date of decision 03 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/58/D/599/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3011/en-US
TERNA v. Italy
TERNA v. Italy ITA 14/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the conditions set by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57509
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/MKD/1 NULL 2019 05 10T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/MKD/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 10 May 2019 Convention against Torture and Other UHRICAT/OP/MKD/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c08fa3f7-6648-4d34-860e-e11660369e32
THE GEORGIAN LABOUR PARTY v. Georgia
THE GEORGIAN LABOUR PARTY v. Georgia GEO 08/10/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Electoral rights: Infringement of the Labour Party s right to stand for legislative election on account of the Central Electoral Commission s CEC decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3345
TICU v. Romania
TICU v. Romania ROU 01/01/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants in various prisons due to the inadequate management of their severe psychiatric conditions from 2003 to 2019. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13270
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
TSIGARAS v. Greece
TSIGARAS v. Greece GRC 14/11/2019 00:00:00 21/11/2019 15:15:19 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants property rights due to the excessive individual burden they had to bear following the determination by domestic courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54241
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TURKMENISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/TKM/CO/2 NULL 2017 01 23T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/TKM/CO/2 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 23 January 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/TKM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c8a44f33-fe05-4f82-92a4-45c5613aee22
TYSIAC v. Poland
TYSIAC v. Poland POL 24/09/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20592
Tadman et al. v. Canada
Tadman et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/67/D/816/1998 Communication number s : 816/1998 Author: Grant Tadman et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 11 Apr 1997 Date of decision 29 Oct 1999 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/816/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/835/en-US
Taghi Khadje v. Netherlands
Taghi Khadje v. Netherlands CCPR/C/88/D/1438/2005 Communication number s : 1438/2005 Author: Hamid Reza Taghi Khadje Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1438/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1307/en-US