Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 5261 - 5280 of 6205
PONCELET v. Belgium
PONCELET v. Belgium BEL 04/10/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence due to the prosecution of senior civil servant on basis of reports compiled during an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1531
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/PRT/CO/5 6 NULL 2019 12 09T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/PRT/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 9 December 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/PRT/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/40ff33ec-09b4-4466-8ae9-857a38a8b571
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/PRT/CO/3 4 NULL 2014 02 24T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/PRT/CO/3 4 Convention on the Distr.: General 25 February 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/PRT/CO/3-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/22fe2922-ee64-4bdc-8ce9-4c1e156f393b
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/PRT/1 NULL 2019 07 03T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/PRT/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 3 July 2019 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/PRT/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d8a40c9d-dcf3-4f0c-9875-f48acd82fd28
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604
Padilla et al. v. Mexico
Padilla et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016 Communication number s : 2750/2016 Author: Mar a Eugenia Padilla Garc a Ricardo Ulises T llez Padilla and Mar a Eugenia Zald var Padilla on their own behalf and on behalf of Christian T llez Padilla their JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2780/en-US
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand CAT/C/68/D/852/2017 Communication number s : 852/2017 Author: Paul Zentveld represented by counsel Victor Boyd from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights New Zealand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country JUTBCAT/C/68/D/852/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2697/en-US
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, EVALUATION REPORT, NORTH MACEDONIA
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA MKD 2019 03 22 2019 06 27 Adoption: 22 March 2019 Publication: 27 June 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIC
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, amending the control system of the Convention (CETS No. 194) (*)
Protocol No. 14 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms amending the control system of the Convention CETS No. 194 194 Strasbourg 2004 05 13T00:00:00 Since its entry into force this Protocol forms an integrant part of COECETS No. 194https://rm.coe.int/1680083711
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 009)
Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 009 009 Paris 1952 03 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 5 Paris 1954 05 18T00:00:00 10 Ratifications. The COEETS No. 009https://rm.coe.int/168006377c
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US
Q.H.L. v. Australia
Q.H.L. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1938/2010 Communication number s : 1938/2010 Author: Q.H.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 19 Apr 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1938/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1320/en-US
QATAR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
QATAR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/QAT/CO/3 4 NULL 2017 06 22T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/QAT/CO/3 4 Distr.: General Convention on theRights of the Child 22 June 2017 Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/QAT/CO/3-4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8b9dbdfd-cadb-4b4a-b885-0a721ffe6c0c
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/33/2003 Communication number s : 033/2003 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2003 Date of decision 09 Mar 2005 Comment: See also Communication JUTBCERD/C/66/D/33/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1739/en-US
R.D. et al. v. Switzerland
R.D. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/57/D/558/2013 Communication number s : 558/2013 Author: R.D. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Switzerland Submission date 23 Aug 2013 Date of decision 13 May 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/57/D/558/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3009/en-US
R.D. v. Switzerland
R.D. v. Switzerland CAT/C/51/D/426/2010 Communication number s : 426/2010 Author: R.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Switzerland Submission date 14 Jun 2010 Date of decision 08 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/51/D/426/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2/en-US
R.E.I. v. Netherlands
R.E.I. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017 Communication number s : 3015/2017 Author: R.E.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3546/en-US
R.G. et al. v. Denmark
R.G. et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/115/D/2351/2014 Communication number s : 2351/2014 Author: R.G. et al. represented by counsel Helge N rrung Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Denmark Submission date 04 Mar 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2351/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2042/en-US