Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 3920
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BELGIUM : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/BEL/CO/16 19 NULL 2014 03 13T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/BEL/CO/16 19 International Convention on Distr.: General 14 March 2014 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/BEL/CO/16-19https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3947c82d-0d20-4975-93ea-d0a8eacd948b
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic
Bergauer et al. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008 Communication number s : 1748/2008 Author: Josef Bergauer et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 100 Country Czech Republic Submission date 05 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1748/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1553/en-US
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/279/2005 Communication number s : 279/2005 Author: C.T. and K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Sep 2005 Date of decision 17 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/37/D/279/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/102/en-US
Cáceres et al. v. Paraguay
C ceres et al. v. Paraguay CCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016 Communication number s : 2751/2016 Author: Norma Portillo C ceres on her own behalf and that of her deceased brother Rub n Portillo C ceres Hermenegilda C ceres Isabel Bord n Ram rez on her own behalf and JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2751/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2784/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CAMBODIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CAMBODIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/KHM/CO/2 NULL 2023 03 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/KHM/CO/2 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 27 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/KHM/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/37e881bf-5024-4e67-addb-71ca8cf28a25
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS
CASE OF A.H. AND J.K. v. CYPRUS 41903/10 41911/10 CHARALAMBIDOU N. CYP 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD004190310https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156264
CASE OF A.L. (X.W.) v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.L. X.W. v. RUSSIA 44095/14 TSEYTLINA O. GOLUBOK S. RUS 10/29/2015 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Article 2 1 Death penalty Conditional China Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1029JUD004409514https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-158148
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 47220/19 GLUSHKOVA T. KHAYMOVICH D. RUS 7/6/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0706JUD004722019https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210878
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY
CASE OF A.M. v. NORWAY 30254/18 ANDRESEN K.S.S. NOR 3/24/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0324JUD003025418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216348
CASE OF A.P., GARÇON AND NICOT v. FRANCE
CASE OF A.P. GAR ON AND NICOT v. FRANCE 79885/12 52471/13 52596/13 SCP GATINEAU FATTACCINI SCP THOUIN PALAT BOUCARD FOURNIER J. PIERRAT E. FRA 4/6/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0406JUD007988512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172913