Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 4226
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BAHRAIN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 NULL 2017 05 29T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BHR/CO/2 3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 29 May 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/BHR/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2b4b69f2-8805-4d8f-900f-73aa61bc578e
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 NULL 2018 11 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BLR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c58ec660-a181-4765-ac2d-0d021de10d06
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/BEN/3 NULL 2018 10 01T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BEN/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 1 October 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/BEN/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4f5f2925-7602-430e-8b53-d01b5cd06b4d
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada
Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. v. Canada CCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013 Communication number s : 2285/2013 Author: Basem Ahmed Issa Yassin et. al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 120 Country Canada Submission date 28 Feb 2013 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2285/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2316/en-US
Ben Ali v. Tunisia
Ben Ali v. Tunisia CCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012 Communication number s : 2130/2012 Author: Zine El Abidine Ben Ali Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Tunisia Submission date 19 Jan 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2130/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2083/en-US
Ben Djazia et al v. Spain
Ben Djazia et al v. Spain E/C.12/61/D/5/2015 Communication number s : 005/2015 Author: Mohamed Ben Djazia and Naouel Bellili Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Spain Submission date 20 Feb 2015 Date of decision 20 Jun 2017 Comment: JUTBE/C.12/61/D/5/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2407/en-US
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan
Berik Zhagiparov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014 Communication number s : 2441/2014 Author: Berik Zhagiparov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 25 Oct 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2441/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2553/en-US
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal
Bholi Pharaka v. Nepal CCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016 Communication number s : 2773/2016 Author: Bholi Pharaka Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Nepal Submission date 11 May 2016 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2773/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2779/en-US
Breleur v. France
Breleur v. France CERD/C/107/D/66/2018 Communication number s : 66/2018 Author: Stanislas Breleur Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country France Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 30 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/107/D/66/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3602/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
C.L.D. v. France
C.L.D. v. France CCPR/C/33/D/228/1987 Communication number s : 228/1987 Author: C.L.D. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 33 Country France Submission date 16 May 1987 Date of decision 18 Jul 1988 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/228/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/639/en-US