Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 90
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A/HRC/47/18: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4718-operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/AUS/CO/5 6 NULL 2019 11 01T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/AUS/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 1 November 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/AUS/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/565aabfe-16c4-47bc-9476-e15faeda599d
Bellini v. Italy
Bellini v. Italy CRPD/C/27/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 51/2018 Author: Maria Simona Bellini Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Italy Submission date 28 Mar 2017 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3604/en-US
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25680/94 GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 451 429 310 450 240 343 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002568094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60595
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE 5TH PERIODIC REPORT OF NEW ZEALAND : COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE 5TH PERIODIC REPORT OF NEW ZEALAND : COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD CRC/C/NZL/CO/5 NULL 2016 10 20T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/NZL/CO/5 Convention on the Distr.: General 21 October 2016 Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/NZL/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1a173e71-ba72-4cd6-8f27-7fd9f07069e2
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Denmark
Fifth Opinion on Denmark DNK ACFC/OP/V 2019 003 2019 11 07 2020 01 29 ACFC/OP/V 2019 003 Published on 29/01/2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_OP_Denmark_en
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Belgium, Denmark and Palau
Human Rights Council MORNING 21 September 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Belgium Denmark and Palau. Francois Roux Permanent Representative of Belgium to the United Nations Office at UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-belgium
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on the Marshall Islands, Croatia and Jamaica
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 17 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on the Marshal Islands Croatia and Jamaica. Phillip Muller Ambassador and Permanent Representative of the Marshall UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-marshall
Human Rights Council holds general debate on Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights CouncilMIDDAY 15 March 2019 The Human Rights Council during a midday meeting held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. In the discussion speakers said that the Universal Periodic Review was one of the great successes of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review
Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights (Combined with a visit to Solomon Islands)
Report to HRC A/HRC/17/37/Add.1 from 7 February 2011 to 11 February 2011 25 May 2011 Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of all human rights particularly UNSPA/HRC/17/37/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f17%2f37%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/NZL/CO/2 3 NULL 2022 09 26T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/NZL/CO/2 3 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 26 September 2022 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of UHRICRPD/C/NZL/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/849cf8f3-328b-47bc-8b1f-5a81ed08def0
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand
Paul Zentveld v. New Zealand CAT/C/68/D/852/2017 Communication number s : 852/2017 Author: Paul Zentveld represented by counsel Victor Boyd from the Citizens Commission on Human Rights New Zealand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country JUTBCAT/C/68/D/852/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2697/en-US