Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2521 - 2540 of 2543
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 from 18 February 2013 to 22 February 2013 5 August 2013 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras United UNSPA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f24%2f45%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/45/9/Add.1 from 13 May 2019 to 17 May 2019 7 July 2020 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Switzerland United Nations UNSPA/HRC/45/9/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f45%2f9%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/42/42/Add.2 from 21 June 2018 to 29 June 2018 26 July 2019 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Austria United Nations UNSPA/HRC/42/42/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f42%2f42%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Wuyts v. Netherlands
Wuyts v. Netherlands CCPR/C/69/D/785/1997 Communication number s : 785/1997 Author: Alexandre Wuyts Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Netherlands Submission date 24 Jun 1996 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/785/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/884/en-US
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X v. Australia,Lebanon
X v. Australia Lebanon CAT/C/42/D/324/2007 Communication number s : 324/2007 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Australia Lebanon Submission date 02 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Apr 2009 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/42/D/324/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/69/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
Y. v. Canada,Sri Lanka
Y. v. Canada Sri Lanka CCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013 Communication number s : 2280/2013 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Canada Sri Lanka Submission date 29 Jul 2013 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1995/en-US
Y v. Switzerland
Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/72/D/916/2019 Communication number s : 916/2019 Author: Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Feb 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/916/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3352/en-US
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine
YAKOVENKO v. Ukraine UKR 25/01/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31204
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YORDANOVA AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/09/2012 00:00:00 16/10/2018 15:10:36 Case Description: This group of cases concerns interferences with the applicants right to respect for their home or their private and family life as a result of eviction or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1924
Yasseen and Thomas v. Guyana
Yasseen and Thomas v. Guyana CCPR/C/62/D/676/1996 Communication number s : 676/1996 Author: Abdool Saleem Yasseen and Noel Thomas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Guyana Submission date 02 Feb 1996 Date of decision 30 Mar 1998 JUTBCCPR/C/62/D/676/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/836/en-US
Young-kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea
Young kwan Kim et al. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012 Communication number s : 2179/2012 Author: Young kwan Kim et al. represented by counsel Du Jin Oh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Republic of Korea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2179/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1939/en-US
Z.B. v. Hungary
Z.B. v. Hungary CCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016 Communication number s : 2768/2016 Author: Z.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Hungary Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2538/en-US
Z.H. v. Canada
Z.H. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/604/2014 Communication number s : 604/2014 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 18 May 2014 Date of decision 20 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/604/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2071/en-US
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia CERD/C/55/D/6/1995 Communication number s : 6/1995 Author: Z.U.B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Australia Submission date 17 Jan 1995 Date of decision 26 Dec 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/55/D/6/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3024/en-US
Z. v. Switzerland
Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/738/2016 Communication number s : 738/2016 Author: Z. represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 23 Mar 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: Decision of JUTBCAT/C/64/D/738/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2465/en-US
Zilkija Selimović et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zilkija Selimovi et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010 Communication number s : 2003/2010 Author: Zilkija Selimovi et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 04 May 2010 Date JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1859/en-US