Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 203
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A. v. THE NETHERLANDS 4900/06 SCH LLER P.J. FERSCHTMAN M. NLD 7/20/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to Libya No violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 444 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0720JUD000490006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100038
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK
CASE OF AGGERHOLM v. DENMARK 45439/18 JENSEN T. DNK 9/15/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 350 90 193 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915JUD004543918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-204602
CASE OF AL-ADSANI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL ADSANI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 35763/97 GBR 11/21/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 6 1 State Immunity Act 1978 section 1 1 350 492 310 445 41 7 293 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003576397 CASE OF AL ADSANI v. THE UNITED ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1121JUD003576397https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59885
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 KENTRIDGE Sir Sydney MULLER Mark OTTY Timothy TUGLUK Aysel TUR 5/12/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0512JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69022
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY 46221/99 N/A TUR 3/12/2003 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 Review of lawfulness of detention Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0312JUD004622199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60979
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28957/95 N/A GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002895795https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60596
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 TUR 5/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 567 197 14 216 577 283 26 1 126 214 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0512JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144151
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF F.G. v. SWEDEN 43611/11 LOVEDAY D. SWE 3/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Expulsion Conditional Iran No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iran ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0323JUD004361111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161829
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 52999/08 61779/08 HOWELLS GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Juries Act 1974 1974 Act 445 76 180 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108168
CASE OF HODE AND ABDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HODE AND ABDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22341/09 THRILLING I. GBR 11/6/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for home Article 8 Right to respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD002234109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114244
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF I. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25680/94 GBR 7/11/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 12 No separate issue under Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 451 429 310 450 240 343 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD002568094https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60595
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760