Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2062
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A.S. v. Turkey
A.S. v. Turkey TUR 28/03/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to delays by the administration in paying additional compensation awarded for expropriation and substantial difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28569
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey
A.T. AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28793
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ACAR v. Turkey
ACAR v. Turkey TUR 13/12/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by domestic courts for the expropriation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30122
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578
AKCA v. Turkey
AKCA v. Turkey TUR 03/10/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the expropriation and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26580
AKKUS v. Turkey
AKKUS v. Turkey TUR 09/07/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5460
AKTAS & OTHERS v. Turkey
AKTAS OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 30/04/2001 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26482
ALALOGLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ALALOGLU AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 04/02/2020 00:00:00 12/02/2020 10:43:07 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54715
ALTINAY v. Turkey
ALTINAY v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Discrimination in conjunction with the right to education: unforeseeable change in the rules on access to university several years after the applicant had made his educational EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37284
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
ATATUR AND PAMIR v. Turkey
ATATUR AND PAMIR v. Turkey TUR 14/01/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26772
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden
B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016 Communication number s : 2744/2016 Author: B.A.E.W. and E.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2847/en-US
BUBILIK v. Turkey
BUBILIK v. Turkey TUR 29/09/1999 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26810
BUCHEN v. the Czech Republic
BUCHEN v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Discrimination: Unjustified difference in treatment between the applicant and various other categories of former members of the armed force resulting in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6058
BURHAN BILGIN v. Turkey
BURHAN BILGIN v. Turkey TUR 20/09/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26706
Breleur v. France
Breleur v. France CERD/C/107/D/66/2018 Communication number s : 66/2018 Author: Stanislas Breleur Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country France Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 30 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/107/D/66/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3602/en-US
CALLI v. Turkey
CALLI v. Turkey TUR 12/12/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the expropriation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28553
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972