Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 2570
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/273/1988 Communication number s : 273/1988 Author: B.d.B. G.B. C.J.K. L.P.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Jan 1988 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/273/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/427/en-US
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELARUS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 NULL 2018 11 22T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BLR/CO/5 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 November 2018 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BLR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c58ec660-a181-4765-ac2d-0d021de10d06
BUBILIK v. Turkey
BUBILIK v. Turkey TUR 29/09/1999 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26810
BUCHEN v. the Czech Republic
BUCHEN v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Discrimination: Unjustified difference in treatment between the applicant and various other categories of former members of the armed force resulting in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6058
BURHAN BILGIN v. Turkey
BURHAN BILGIN v. Turkey TUR 20/09/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26706
Baranovs v. Latvia
Baranovs v. Latvia CCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017 Communication number s : 3021/2017 Author: Ivans Baranovs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Latvia Submission date 06 Sep 2017 Date of decision 18 Oct 2021 Comment: Individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3021/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3167/en-US
Bellini v. Italy
Bellini v. Italy CRPD/C/27/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 51/2018 Author: Maria Simona Bellini Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Italy Submission date 28 Mar 2017 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3604/en-US
Brandsma v. Netherlands
Brandsma v. Netherlands CCPR/C/80/D/977/2001 Communication number s : 977/2001 Author: R.P.C.W.M. Brandsma Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Netherlands Submission date 30 Oct 2000 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/977/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/376/en-US
Brewer-Carías v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Brewer Car as v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/133/D/3003/2017 Communication number s : 3003/2017 Author: Allan Brewer Car as Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission date 21 Dec JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3003/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3164/en-US
Broeks v. Netherlands
Broeks v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/172/1984 Communication number s : 172/1984 Author: S.W.M. Broeks represented by Marie Emmie Diepstraten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 01 Jun 1984 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/172/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/653/en-US
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada
Byrne and Lazarescu v. Canada CCPR/C/65/D/742/1997 Communication number s : 742/1997 Author: Pamela R. M. Byrne and Linda E. Lazarescu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Canada Submission date 23 Apr 1996 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/742/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/775/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CABO VERDE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/CPV/CO/2 NULL 2019 06 26T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/CPV/CO/2 Convention on the Distr.: General 27 June 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/CPV/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/82f34cce-dc38-4b27-a723-cb9b768d2cd2
CALLI v. Turkey
CALLI v. Turkey TUR 12/12/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the expropriation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28553
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA 55798/16 55808/16 55817/16 55820/16 55823/16 GERICKE C. MKD 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005579816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216861
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332