Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3081 - 3100 of 4092
Crippa et al. v. France
Crippa et al. v. France CCPR/C/85/D/993 995/2001 Communication number s : 995/2001 993/2001 Author: Gabriel Crippa Jean Louis Masson and Marie Joe Zimmermann Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 01 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/993-995/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1230/en-US
D.Y. v. Sweden
D.Y. v. Sweden CAT/C/50/D/463/2011 Communication number s : 463/2011 Author: D.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Sweden Submission date 30 May 2011 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/50/D/463/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/12/en-US
D.Z. v. Netherlands
D.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016 Communication number s : 2918/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Nov 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3295/en-US
DENLI v. Turkey
DENLI v. Turkey TUR 23/10/2002 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:21:37 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the expropriation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30488
DENMARK: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
DENMARK: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/DNK/CO/6 NULL 2019 11 12T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/DNK/CO/6 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 12 November 2019 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/DNK/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b509abf4-a119-4ac1-8326-6ff08062f679
DHAHBI v. Italy
DHAHBI v. Italy ITA 08/07/2014 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:32:00 Case Description: Difference of treatment for obtaining the family allowance due to nationality: difference of treatment based on nationality justified by insufficient budgetary rationales EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45046
DRIHA v. Romania
DRIHA v. Romania ROU 21/05/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Unlawful taxation of allowances: unlawful submission to income tax of reserve assignment allowances difference in treatment between the applicants and persons in the same EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16355
DUDU CALKAN v. Turkey
DUDU CALKAN v. Turkey TUR 28/06/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation awarded by the domestic courts for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26620
Danning v. Netherlands
Danning v. Netherlands CCPR/C/29/D/180/1984 Communication number s : 180/1984 Author: L.G. Danning Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Jul 1984 Date of decision 09 Apr 1987 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/29/D/180/1984https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/537/en-US
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Dayras et al. v. France
Dayras et al. v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007 Communication number s : 013/2007 Author: Mich le Dayras Nelly Campo Trumel Sylvie Delange Fr d rique Remy Cremieu Micheline Zeghouani H l ne Muzard Fekkar and Ad le Daufrene Levrard Type of decision: JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1712/en-US
De Vos v. Netherlands
De Vos v. Netherlands CCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003 Communication number s : 1192/2003 Author: M. de Vos Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Netherlands Submission date 06 Aug 2002 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/982/en-US
Dean v. New Zealand
Dean v. New Zealand CCPR/C/95/D/1512/2006 Communication number s : 1512/2006 Author: Allan Kendrick Dean Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country New Zealand Submission date 08 Sep 2006 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1512/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1510/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy, Complaint No. 91/2013
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro CGIL v. Italy Complaint No. 91/2013 ITA 11 01 000 91 154 163 01 02 000 02 01 000 03 03 000 26 02 163 2015 10 12 2016 04 11 European Committee of Social Rights Comit ESCcc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, Complaint No. 82/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France Complaint No. 82/2012 FRA 16 00 000 30 00 163 91 175 163 91 212 163 19/03/2013 15/07/2013 European Committee of ESCcc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Confederation of Police (EuroCOP) v. Ireland, Complaint No. 83/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Confederation of Police EuroCOP v. Ireland Complaint No. 83/2012 IRL 05 00 000 06 02 000 06 04 000 21 00 000 02/12/2013 17/05/2014 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux ESCcc-83-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-83-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Mental Disability advocacy Center (MDAC) v. Belgium: Complaint No. 109/2014
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Mental Disability advocacy Center MDAC v. Belgium: Complaint No. 109/2014 BEL 15 01 000 17 01 163 17 02 163 91 172 163 91 177 163 91 178 163 2017 10 16 2018 03 16 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en ESCcc-109-2014-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-109-2014-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the Merits: Finnish Society of Social Rights v. Finland, Complaint No. 88/2012
Decision on the Merits: Finnish Society of Social Rights v. Finland Complaint No. 88/2012 FIN 12 01 000 12 02 000 12 03 000 13 01 000 2014 09 09 2015 02 11 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS ESCcc-88-2012-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-88-2012-dmerits-en
Decision on the Merits: Transgender Europe and ILGA-Europe v. the Czech Republic: Complaint No. 117/2015
Decision on the Merits: Transgender Europe and ILGA Europe v. the Czech Republic: Complaint No. 117/2015 CZE 11 00 000 2018 05 15 2018 10 01 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 15 May 2018 ESCcc-117-2015-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-117-2015-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace v. Italy, Complaint No. 102/2013
Decision on the merits: Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace v. Italy Complaint No. 102/2013 ITA 91 162 163 91 159 163 2016 07 05 2016 11 16 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 5 July ESCcc-102-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-102-2013-dmerits-en