Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3161 - 3180 of 4092
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. the Netherlands, Complaint No. 134/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. the Netherlands Complaint No. 134/2016 NLD 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 06 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-134-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-134-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No. 128/2016
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe UWE v. Czech Republic Complaint No. 128/2016 CZE 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-128-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-128-2016-dmerits-en
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Portugal, Complaint No. 136/2016
Decision on the mertis: University Women of Europe UWE v. Portugal Complaint No. 136/2016 PRT 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-136-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-136-2016-dmerits-en
Deisl v. Austria
Deisl v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002 Communication number s : 1060/2002 Author: Franz and Maria Deisl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 17 Sep 2001 Date of decision 27 Jul 2004 Comment: The authors asked JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1128/en-US
Derksen v. Netherlands
Derksen v. Netherlands CCPR/C/80/D/976/2001 Communication number s : 976/2001 Author: Cecilia Derksen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Aug 2000 Date of decision 01 Apr 2004 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/976/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1098/en-US
Des Fours Walderode and Kammerlander v. Czech Republic
Des Fours Walderode and Kammerlander v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/73/D/747/1997 Communication number s : 747/1997 Author: Karel Des Fours Walderode and Johanna Kammerlander Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/747/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/937/en-US
Diergaardt et al. v. Namibia
Diergaardt et al. v. Namibia CCPR/C/69/D/760/1996 Communication number s : 760/1996 Author: J.G.A. Diergaardt et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country Namibia Submission date 17 Nov 1996 Date of decision 25 Jul 2000 Comment: 7 JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/760/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/881/en-US
Dixit v. Australia
Dixit v. Australia CCPR/C/77/D/978/2001 Communication number s : 978/2001 Author: Sunil Dixit Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Australia Submission date 18 May 1998 Date of decision 28 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/978/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1042/en-US
Dorin Șeremet et al. v. Republic of Moldova
Dorin eremet et al. v. Republic of Moldova CCPR/C/133/D/3278/2018 Communication number s : 3278/2018 Author: Dorin eremet et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 10 Aug 2018 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3278/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3158/en-US
Durmic v. Montenegro,Serbia,Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro)
Durmic v. Montenegro Serbia Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Serbia and Montenegro CERD/C/68/D/29/2003 Communication number s : 029/2003 Author: Dragan Durmic Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Montenegro Serbia Federal Republic of JUTBCERD/C/68/D/29/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1736/en-US
E.A. AND OTHERS v. Turkey
E.A. AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 17/10/2001 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28805
E. B. v. New Zealand
E. B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005 Communication number s : 1368/2005 Author: E. B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country New Zealand Submission date 24 Dec 2004 Date of decision 16 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1368/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1333/en-US
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
E/C.12/ITA/CO/5 ITALY
E/C.12/ITA/CO/5 ITALY E/C.12/ITA/CO/5 NULL 2015 10 27T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/ITA/CO/5 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 28 October 2015 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding observations on UHRIE/C.12/ITA/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6124eeb8-c843-4329-8d41-a64362d31185
E/C.12/TUN/CO/3 Tunisia
E/C.12/TUN/CO/3 Tunisia E/C.12/TUN/CO/3 NULL 2016 11 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/TUN/CO/3 Distr.: General 14 November 2016 Economic and Social Council English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/TUN/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d41a54c5-b06f-41c6-b3ab-4430e56f7b6f
E.L.A. v. France
E.L.A. v. France CED/C/19/D/3/2019 Communication number s : 003/2019 Author: E.L.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 19 Online Country France Submission date 24 Sep 2018 Date of decision 25 Sep 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCED/C/19/D/3/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2755/en-US
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden
E.M.M.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/960/2019 Communication number s : 960/2019 Author: E.M.M.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 03 Oct 2019 Date of decision 21 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/960/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3326/en-US
E.W. et al. v. Netherlands
E.W. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/47/D/429/1990 Communication number s : 429/1990 Author: E.W. et al. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 47 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Nov 1990 Date of decision 08 Apr 1993 JUTBCCPR/C/47/D/429/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/603/en-US
E.Z. v. Kazakhstan
E.Z. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/113/D/2021/2010 Communication number s : 2021/2010 Author: E.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 09 Nov 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: Treatment of persons JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2021/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1917/en-US
ECRI General Policy Recommendation No. 5 (Revised) on preventing and combating Anti-Muslim racism and discrimination
ECRI General Policy Recommendation No. 5 Revised on preventing and combating Anti Muslim racism and discrimination 2021 12 08 2022 03 01 CRI 2022 06 ECRI General Policy Recommendation No. 5 revised on Preventing and Combating Anti MUSLIM RACISM AND ECRIREC-05rev-2022-06-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=REC-05rev-2022-06-ENG