Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3301 - 3320 of 4092
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Latvia
Government comments on the third report on Latvia LVA 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Latvia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRILVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-III-2008-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Poland
Government comments on the third report on Poland POL 2004 12 17 2005 06 14 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Poland ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIPOL-COM-III-2005-025-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=POL-COM-III-2005-025-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine
Government comments on the third report on Ukraine UKR 2007 06 29 2008 02 12 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Ukraine ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIUKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=UKR-COM-III-2008-004-ENG
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia
Grainne Sherlock v. Australia CRPD/C/24/D/20/2014 Communication number s : 20/2014 Author: Grainne Sherlock Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Australia Submission date 24 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/24/D/20/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3069/en-US
Groupe d’Intérêt pour le Matronyme v. France
Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007 Communication number s : 012/2007 Author: Groupe d Int r t pour le Matronyme Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 44 Country France Submission date 26 May 2006 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/12/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1709/en-US
Gueye et al. v. France
Gueye et al. v. France CCPR/C/35/D/196/1985 Communication number s : 196/1985 Author: Ibrahima Gueye and 742 other retired Senegalese members of the French army Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country France Submission date 12 Oct 1985 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/196/1985https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/676/en-US
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
H.K v. Australia
H.K v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/701/2015 Communication number s : 701/2015 Author: H.K Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60th session Country Australia Submission date 16 Sep 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: Views violation. JUTBCAT/C/60/D/701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2327/en-US
H.K. v. Denmark
H.K. v. Denmark CRC/C/90/D/99/2019 Communication number s : 99/2019 Author: H.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Denmark Submission date 29 Aug 2019 Date of decision 01 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/90/D/99/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3446/en-US
H.L. v. Australia
H.L. v. Australia CAT/C/71/D/754/2016 Communication number s : 754/2016 Author: H.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2016 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/754/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3358/en-US
H.M. v. Spain
H.M. v. Spain CRC/C/87/D/115/2020 Communication number s : 115/2020 Author: H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Spain Submission date 08 Mar 2020 Date of decision 31 May 2021 Comment: This decision has a Corrigendum annexed see JUTBCRC/C/87/D/115/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2958/en-US
HATTATOGLU v. Turkey
HATTATOGLU v. Turkey TUR 26/06/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28777
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. Poland
HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. Poland POL 19/06/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of property: Systemic problem the malfunctioning of national legislation on housing in that: it imposed restrictions on landlords rights and did not provide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39852
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland
Haraldsson and Sveinsson v. Iceland CCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004 Communication number s : 1306/2004 Author: Erlingur Sveinn Haraldsson and rn Sn var Sveinsson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Iceland Submission date 15 Sep 2003 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1306/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1375/en-US
Heidar v. Sweden
Heidar v. Sweden CAT/C/29/D/204/2002 Communication number s : 204/2002 Author: Hassan Karbalai Heidar Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 29 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Mar 2002 Date of decision 19 Nov 2002 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/29/D/204/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/181/en-US
Hermansen, Edrich and Vilstrup v. Denmark
Hermansen Edrich and Vilstrup v. Denmark CERD/C/77/D/44/2009 Communication number s : 044/2009 Author: Nicolai Hermansen Signe Edrich and Jonna Vilstrup Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country Denmark Submission date 25 Feb 2009 JUTBCERD/C/77/D/44/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1725/en-US
Hoffman and Simpson v. Canada
Hoffman and Simpson v. Canada CCPR/C/84/D/1220/2003 Communication number s : 1220/2003 Author: Walter Hoffman and Gwen Simpson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Canada Submission date 05 Oct 2003 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1220/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/983/en-US
Hoofdman v. Netherlands
Hoofdman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/64/D/602/1994 Communication number s : 602/1994 Author: Cornelis Hoofdman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 May 1994 Date of decision 03 Nov 1998 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/602/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/761/en-US
Hopu and Bessert v. France
Hopu and Bessert v. France CCPR/C/60/D/549/1993 Communication number s : 549/1993 Author: Francis Hopu and Tepoaitu Bessert Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country France Submission date 04 Jun 1993 Date of decision 29 Jul 1997 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/60/D/549/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/878/en-US