Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2861 - 2880 of 3578
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta
Government comments on the fourth report on Malta MLT 2013 06 20 2013 10 15 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI in accordance with its country ECRIMLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-IV-2013-037-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Switzerland
Government comments on the third report on Switzerland CHE 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Switzerland ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis ECRICHE-COM-III-2004-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CHE-COM-III-2004-005-ENG
Grioua v. Algeria
Grioua v. Algeria CCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004 Communication number s : 1327/2004 Author: Messaouda Grioua n e Atamna Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Oct 2004 Date of decision 10 Jul 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1327/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1367/en-US
H. E-M. v. Canada
H. E M. v. Canada CAT/C/46/D/395/2009 Communication number s : 395/2009 Author: H. E M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 17 Aug 2009 Date of decision 23 May 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/46/D/395/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/54/en-US
H.G. v. Sweden
H.G. v. Sweden CCPR/C/132/D/3266/2018 Communication number s : 3266/2018 Author: H.G. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Nov 2018 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3266/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3178/en-US
H.H., I.H. and Y.H. v. Georgia
H.H. I.H. and Y.H. v. Georgia CEDAW/C/80/D/140/2019 Communication number s : 140/2019 Author: H.H. I.H. and Y.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Georgia Submission date 19 Sep 2018 Date of decision 25 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/80/D/140/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3044/en-US
H.R. v. Uzbekistan
H.R. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/131/D/2479/2014 Communication number s : 2479/2014 Author: H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 131 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 23 May 2014 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2479/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3204/en-US
H.S. v. Denmark
H.S. v. Denmark CAT/C/71/D/792/2016 Communication number s : 792/2016 Author: H.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Dec 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/792/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3369/en-US
H.T. v. Switzerland
H.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/70/D/888/2018 Communication number s : 888/2018 Author: H.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Sep 2018 Date of decision 30 Dec 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/70/D/888/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3459/en-US
HADDAD v. Spain
HADDAD v. Spain ESP 18/09/2019 00:00:00 30/09/2019 10:16:14 Case Description: The Haddad case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for family life as a result of the decisions taken by the administrative and judicial authorities to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52853
HOLY SEE : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
HOLY SEE : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/VAT/CO/1 NULL 2014 06 16T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/VAT/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 17 June 2014 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/VAT/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5021c659-b418-4bb4-bef6-f99ba3b6d06d
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010 Communication number s : 1973/2010 Author: Hew Raymond Griffiths represented by counsels Joanna Mansfield and Nicolas Patrick Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1893/en-US
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico CCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018 Communication number s : 3259/2018 Author: Irma Leticia Hidalgo Rea Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Mexico Submission date 15 Jan 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3227/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcome of Bahrain
MORNING 24 March 2023 Council Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bahrain. It also concluded the general debate on agenda item five on human UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcome-bahrain
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Madagascar, Iraq, Slovenia and Egypt
Human Rights Council 12 March 2020 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Madagascar Iraq Slovenia and Egypt. Mireille Rabenoro President of the Independent National Commission on Human Rights for the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-madagascar
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on Nauru, Rwanda and Nepal
Human Rights Council MORNING 7 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on Nauru Rwanda and Nepal. Marlene Moses Permanent Representative of Nauru to the United Nations in New York said the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-nauru-rwanda
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines, Algeria and Poland
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the Philippines Algeria and Poland. Teofilo S. Pilando Deputy Executive Secretary Vice Minister Office of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-philippines
Hylton (2) v. Jamaica
Hylton 2 v. Jamaica CCPR/C/57/D/600/1994 Communication number s : 600/1994 Author: Dwayne Hylton Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Jamaica Submission date 21 Oct 1994 Date of decision 16 Jul 1996 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/57/D/600/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/694/en-US