Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2941 - 2960 of 3578
Kohoutek v. Czech Republic
Kohoutek v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/93/D/1448/2006 Communication number s : 1448/2006 Author: Ivanka Kohoutek Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Czech Republic Submission date 02 Feb 2006 Date of decision 17 Jul 2008 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1448/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1431/en-US
LABUDEK v. Poland
LABUDEK v. Poland POL 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: Excessive length of detention on remand between 2011 and 2016 due to extensions that were not justified by sufficient grounds and the lack of diligence in the conduct of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55273
LISOVSKIJ v. Lithuania
LISOVSKIJ v. Lithuania LTU 02/08/2017 00:00:00 01/09/2017 16:40:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unjustified and excessively lengthy detention on remand as the authorities did not display requisite diligence in the conduct of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47581
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LITHUANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/LTU/CO/3 NULL 2023 03 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/LTU/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 30 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/LTU/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6d4b4087-7a0e-42f5-bf76-6ff7ce7e5f83
LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. Portugal
LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. Portugal PRT 19/12/2017 00:00:00 12/01/2018 10:16:53 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate and timely investigation into allegations of medical negligence resulting in a patient s death following an operation due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48607
LOZOVYYE v. Russia
LOZOVYYE v. Russia RUS 24/07/2018 00:00:00 11/10/2018 12:03:34 Case Description: This case concerns the authorities failure to notify the applicants of their adult son s death in 2006 violation of Article 8 . In particular the Court found that the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50519
LUKENDA v. Slovenia
LUKENDA v. Slovenia SVN 06/01/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:49 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil criminal enforcement or administrative proceedings and lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6924
LUXEMBOURG: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
LUXEMBOURG: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/LUX/CO/4 NULL 2022 11 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/LUX/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 15 November 2022 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights UHRIE/C.12/LUX/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f37f8eef-ff32-4259-8bf2-1a3a02827613
Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France
Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France CERD/C/89/D/52/2012 Communication number s : 052/2012 Author: Laurent Gabre Gabaroum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country France Submission date 19 Mar 2012 Date of decision 10 May 2016 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/89/D/52/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2175/en-US
Loor Chila v. Spain
Loor Chila v. Spain E/C.12/70/D/102/2019 Communication number s : 102/2019 Author: Gladis Patricia Loor Chila Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 70 To be confirmed Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 12 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBE/C.12/70/D/102/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2972/en-US
Lourdes da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil
Lourdes da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil CEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008 Communication number s : 017/2008 Author: Maria de Lourdes da Silva Pimentel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Brazil Submission date 30 Nov 2007 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1701/en-US
Lumanog and Santos v. Philippines
Lumanog and Santos v. Philippines CCPR/C/92/D/1466/2006 Communication number s : 1466/2006 Author: Lenido Lumanog and Augusto Santos Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Philippines Submission date 07 Mar 2006 Date of decision 20 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1466/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1407/en-US
M.A.B. v. Argentina
M.A.B. v. Argentina CCPR/C/116/D/2122/2011 Communication number s : 2122/2011 Author: M.A.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 116 Country Argentina Submission date 06 Aug 2010 Date of decision 30 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2122/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3085/en-US
M.A.H. and F.H v. Switzerland
M.A.H. and F.H v. Switzerland CAT/C/51/D/438/2010 Communication number s : 438/2010 Author: M.A.H. and F.H Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Nov 2010 Date of decision 07 Nov 2013 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/51/D/438/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/6/en-US
M. B. B. v. Spain
M. B. B. v. Spain E/C.12/68/D/79/2018 Communication number s : 079/2018 Author: M. B. B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Virtual Session Country Spain Submission date 13 Oct 2018 Date of decision 15 Oct 2020 Comment: This document JUTBE/C.12/68/D/79/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2767/en-US
M.B. v. New Zealand
M.B. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/119/D/2934/2017 Communication number s : 2934/2017 Author: M.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Dec 2016 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2934/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2295/en-US
M.D.C.P. v. Spain
M.D.C.P. v. Spain CEDAW/C/84/D/154/2020 Communication number s : 154/2020 Author: M.D.C.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Spain Submission date 10 Nov 2018 Date of decision 24 Feb 2023 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/154/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3754/en-US
M.K.A.H. v. Switzerland
M.K.A.H. v. Switzerland CRC/C/88/D/95/2019 Communication number s : 095/2019 Author: A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Aug 2019 Date of decision 22 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/88/D/95/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2957/en-US
M. K. D. A.-A. v. Denmark
M. K. D. A. A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/56/D/44/2012 Communication number s : 044/2012 Author: M. K. D. A. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Sep 2012 Date of decision 18 Oct 2013 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/56/D/44/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1699/en-US
M.K.M. v. Australia
M.K.M. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/681/2015 Communication number s : 681/2015 Author: M.K.M. represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 18 May 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 JUTBCAT/C/60/D/681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2253/en-US