Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3021 - 3040 of 3578
P. S. N. v. Denmark
P. S. N. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/36/2006 Communication number s : 036/2006 Author: P. S. N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Feb 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/36/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1733/en-US
PAKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PAKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/PAK/CO/1 NULL 2017 06 01T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/PAK/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 1 June 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/PAK/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a78d3f49-640b-4514-9506-a6c817a55a2e
PETRELLA v. Italy
PETRELLA v. Italy ITA 06/09/2021 00:00:00 23/09/2021 15:54:44 Case Description: The case concerned the length of the preliminary investigations between 2001 and 2007 in the context of criminal proceedings brought on the basis of a complaint by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58411
PILAGS v. Latvia
PILAGS v. Latvia LVA 03/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: The present case concerns a breach of the right to a fair trial as the domestic courts did not properly examine the applicant s allegations of incitement in the administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59813
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
POLAT v. Austria
POLAT v. Austria AUT 20/10/2021 00:00:00 05/11/2021 13:57:21 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / freedom of religion: Disproportionate interference on account of the postmortem examination of the applicant s baby carried out against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58807
POPADIC v. Serbia
POPADIC v. Serbia SRB 20/12/2022 00:00:00 09/01/2023 11:53:24 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the excessively lengthy matrimonial proceedings which lasted four years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62246
POPARA v. Croatia
POPARA v. Croatia HRV 15/06/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of the right to a court due to the automatic stay of civil proceedings brought against the State for damages resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10083
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/PRT/CO/1 NULL 2016 05 20T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/PRT/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 20 May 2016 of Persons with Disabilities English Original: Spanish Committee on the Rights of Persons UHRICRPD/C/PRT/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0c20b7c2-4184-45f4-a24c-256fb4472267
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/PRT/CO/5 NULL 2023 03 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/PRT/CO/5 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 30 March 2023 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/PRT/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/11eef3eb-b3b9-4fc2-a8bc-1e56f8772ed3
Padilla et al. v. Mexico
Padilla et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016 Communication number s : 2750/2016 Author: Mar a Eugenia Padilla Garc a Ricardo Ulises T llez Padilla and Mar a Eugenia Zald var Padilla on their own behalf and on behalf of Christian T llez Padilla their JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2780/en-US
Pereira and the other members of the Campo Agua’ẽ indigenous community v. Paraguay
Pereira and the other members of the Campo Agua indigenous community v. Paraguay CCPR/C/132/D/2552/2015 Communication number s : 2552/2015 Author: Benito Oliveira Pereira and Lucio Guillermo Sosa Benega on their own behalf and that of the other m Type of JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2552/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3751/en-US
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/33/2003 Communication number s : 033/2003 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2003 Date of decision 09 Mar 2005 Comment: See also Communication JUTBCERD/C/66/D/33/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1739/en-US
R.E.I. v. Netherlands
R.E.I. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017 Communication number s : 3015/2017 Author: R.E.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3546/en-US
R. K. v. Australia
R. K. v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/609/2014 Communication number s : 609/2014 Author: R. K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 06 May 2014 Date of decision 11 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/609/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2122/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US
R.R., M.R. v. Finland
R.R. M.R. v. Finland CEDAW/C/75/D/111/2017 Communication number s : 111/2017 Author: R.R. M.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Finland Submission date Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/111/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2706/en-US
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy
R.V. AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 18/10/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: The Terna group of cases concerns the authorities failure to make adequate and sufficient efforts to ensure respect of the applicants visiting rights under the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54201
Rékasi v. Hungary
R kasi v. Hungary CRPD/C/25/D/44/2017 Communication number s : 44/2017 Author: Magdolna R kasi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Hungary Submission date 27 Jul 2017 Date of decision 06 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/25/D/44/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3064/en-US
RAFFI v. France
RAFFI v. France FRA 13/09/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:13:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and lack of an effective remedy/ Articles 6 1 and 13 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32871