Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3281 - 3300 of 3578
S.D.P.T., Y.F.R.T. and P.T. v. Canada
S.D.P.T. Y.F.R.T. and P.T. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/2034/2011 Communication number s : 2034/2011 Author: S.D.P.T. Y.F.R.T. and P.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 27 Mar 2011 Date of decision 29 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2034/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3083/en-US
S.F.M. v. Spain
S.F.M. v. Spain CEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018 Communication number s : 138/2018 Author: S.F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 28 Feb 2020 Comment: Obstetric violence Substantive issues: gender JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2710/en-US
S.H. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
S.H. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CEDAW/C/76/D/116/2017 Communication number s : 116/2017 Author: S.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 27 Jan 2017 Date of decision 09 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/116/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3040/en-US
S.H. v. Finland
S.H. v. Finland CCPR/C/128/D/2381/2014 Communication number s : 2381/2014 Author: S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Finland Submission date 10 Apr 2014 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2381/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2867/en-US
S.H. v. Finland
S.H. v. Finland CRC/C/81/D/6/2016 Communication number s : 006/2016 Author: S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Finland Submission date 16 Jul 2016 Date of decision 15 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/81/D/6/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2524/en-US
S. J. D. v. Australia
S. J. D. v. Australia CAT/C/51/D/387/2009 Communication number s : 387/2009 Author: S. J. D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2009 Date of decision 14 Nov 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/51/D/387/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2099/en-US
S.L. v. Bulgaria
S.L. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016 Communication number s : 099/2016 Author: S.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Bulgaria Submission date 23 Feb 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/99/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2657/en-US
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom
S.M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Failure to ensure the effectiveness of available procedural safeguards and to act with appropriate due diligence in managing and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48329
S.S.S. v. Canada
S.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/35/D/245/2004 Communication number s : 245/2004 Author: S.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Canada Submission date 24 Feb 2004 Date of decision 16 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/35/D/245/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/122/en-US
S.S. v. Australia
S.S. v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/720/2015 Communication number s : 720/2015 Author: S.S. represented by counsel John Sweeney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Australia Submission date 04 Dec 2015 Date of decision 09 Aug 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/61/D/720/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2278/en-US
S.T. v. Australia
S.T. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/716/2015 Communication number s : 716/2015 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 23 Oct 2015 Date of decision 11 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/716/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3463/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
S. V. P. v. Bulgaria
S. V. P. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/53/D/31/2011 Communication number s : 031/2011 Author: S. V. P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Bulgaria Submission date 03 Dec 2010 Date of decision 12 Oct 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/53/D/31/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1693/en-US
Süsser v. Czech Republic
S sser v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/92/D/1488/2006 Communication number s : 1488/2006 Author: Miroslav S sser Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 92 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Jun 2006 Date of decision 25 Mar 2008 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1488/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1002/en-US
SALIYEV v. Russia
SALIYEV v. Russia RUS 21/01/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of the withdrawal in 2001 of the Magadan newspapers containing the applicant s article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13777
SANDRA JANKOVIC v. Croatia
SANDRA JANKOVIC v. Croatia HRV 14/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of the domestic authorities to implement domestic criminal law mechanisms in respect of the applicant s allegations of physical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10343
SANTOS NUNES v. Portugal
SANTOS NUNES v. Portugal PRT 22/08/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack of diligence of the authorities in enforcing a court decision granting custody of a child. Status of Execution: The court decision was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9719
SCHAAL v. Luxembourg
SCHAAL v. Luxembourg LUX 18/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:38:37 Case Description: Protection of family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement due to suspension by a domestic court of its consideration of a father s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-111
SEAGAL v. Cyprus
SEAGAL v. Cyprus CYP 12/09/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 10:37:04 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and protection of rights in detention: Ill treatment by prison guards and other prisoners and the failure of authorities to conduct an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3219
SERBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
SERBIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/SRB/CO/3 NULL 2022 04 06T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/SRB/CO/3 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 6 April 2022 Original: English Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/SRB/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/cdeaf7fd-4089-4cd8-b28e-6913143b4151