Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 9441 - 9460 of 9622
VISIT TO VIET NAM - REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD
VISIT TO VIET NAM REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE RIGHT TO FOOD A/HRC/40/56/ADD.1 NULL 2018 12 18T00:00:00 SR Food United Nations A/HRC/40/56/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 18 December 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Fortieth UHRIA/HRC/40/56/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/0ce839fb-8470-4a6c-abce-7f5be5972f1e
VLAD v. Romania
VLAD v. Romania ROU 26/02/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: 1 These cases concern the excessive length of civil Nicolau group and criminal proceedings Stoianova and Nedelcu group and the lack of an effective remedy in this respect EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13259
Valetov v. Kazakhstan
Valetov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/110/D/2104/2011 Communication number s : 2104/2011 Author: Nikolai Valetov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 13 Sep 2011 Date of decision 17 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2104/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1818/en-US
Van Den Hemel v. Netherlands
Van Den Hemel v. Netherlands CCPR/C/84/D/1185/2003 Communication number s : 1185/2003 Author: Johannes Van Den Hemel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jun 2002 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1185/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1181/en-US
Vargay v. Canada
Vargay v. Canada CCPR/C/96/D/1639/2007 Communication number s : 1639/2007 Author: Peter Zsolt Vargay Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Canada Submission date 09 Oct 2007 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1639/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1520/en-US
Vasilskis v. Uruguay
Vasilskis v. Uruguay CCPR/C/18/D/80/1980 Communication number s : 080/1980 Author: Sergio Vasilskis alleged victim s brother Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 18 Country Uruguay Submission date 03 Nov 1980 Date of decision 31 Mar 1983 JUTBCCPR/C/18/D/80/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/309/en-US
Vasily Yuzepchuk v. Belarus
Vasily Yuzepchuk v. Belarus CCPR/C/112/D/1906/2009 Communication number s : 1906/2009 Author: Vasily Yuzepchuk represented by counsel Roman Kislyak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Belarus Submission date 02 Oct 2009 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1906/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1884/en-US
Vicencio Scarano Spisso v. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
Vicencio Scarano Spisso v. Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of CCPR/C/119/D/2481/2014 Communication number s : 2481/2014 Author: Vicencio Scarano Spisso Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Venezuela Bolivarian Republic of Submission JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2481/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2239/en-US
Vitaly Lopasov v. Belarus
Vitaly Lopasov v. Belarus CCPR/C/126/D/2269/2013 Communication number s : 2269/2013 Author: Vitaly Lopasov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Dec 2012 Date of decision 25 Jul 2019 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2269/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2901/en-US
Vladislav Chelakh v. Kazakhstan
Vladislav Chelakh v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/121/D/2645/2015 Communication number s : 2645/2015 Author: Vladislav Chelakh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Feb 2015 Date of decision 07 Nov 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2645/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2359/en-US
Voronkov v. Russian Federation
Voronkov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/136/D/2951/2017 Communication number s : 2951/2017 Author: Dmitry Voronkov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Jan 2017 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2951/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3549/en-US
Vos (A.P. Johannes) v. Netherlands
Vos A.P. Johannes v. Netherlands CCPR/C/66/D/786/1997 Communication number s : 786/1997 Author: A.P. Johannes Vos Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 Jul 1996 Date of decision 26 Jul 1999 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/786/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/787/en-US
Vos (Hendrika S.) v. Netherlands
Vos Hendrika S. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/218/1986 Communication number s : 218/1986 Author: Hendrika S. Vos Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Dec 1986 Date of decision 29 Mar 1989 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/218/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/540/en-US
Vyacheslav Berezhnoy v. Russian Federation
Vyacheslav Berezhnoy v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/118/D/2107/2011 Communication number s : 2107/2011 Author: Vyacheslav Berezhnoy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Russian Federation Submission date 26 Sep 2009 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2107/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2151/en-US
W.B.E. v. Netherlands
W.B.E. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/46/D/432/1990 Communication number s : 432/1990 Author: W.B.E. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 46 Country Netherlands Submission date 20 Jul 1990 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/432/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/473/en-US
W. G. D. v. Canada
W. G. D. v. Canada CAT/C/53/D/520/2012 Communication number s : 520/2012 Author: W. G. D. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Canada Submission date 17 Aug 2012 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/520/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2060/en-US
W.M.G. v. Canada
W.M.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011 Communication number s : 2060/2011 Author: W.M.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Canada Submission date 10 May 2011 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2060/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3538/en-US
W v. Finland
W v. Finland FIN 24/07/2007 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings relating to convictions for sexual abuse of children as the accused had not been given the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4906
WIKTORKO v. Poland
WIKTORKO v. Poland POL 30/06/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Ill treatment in a sobering up centre and lack of an effective investigation Status of Execution: Reopening of investigation impossible due to prescription. In 2001 the 1982 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18273
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967