Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 262
A/HRC/47/10: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Nepal
United Nations A/HRC/47/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 30 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4710-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-nepal
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A/HRC/47/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Lebanon
United Nations A/HRC/47/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 7 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc475-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-lebanon
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 TUR 5/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 567 197 14 216 577 283 26 1 126 214 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0512JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144151
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NA T LIMAN v. SWITZERLAND 51357/07 TRIAL INTERNATIONAL CHE 3/15/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Article 41 of the Swiss Code of Obligations Section 3 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0315JUD005135707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181789
CASE OF SALMAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF SALMAN v. TURKEY 21986/93 TUR 6/27/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 2 with regard to death in custody Violation of Art. 2 with regard to failure to carry out an effective investigation Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627JUD002198693https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58735
CASE OF TÜRKOĞLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF T RKO LU v. TURKEY 34506/97 TUNCER G. TUR 3/17/2005 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 as regards the State s alleged failure to protect the right to life Violation of Art. 2 as regards the effectiveness of the investigation No violation of Art. 5 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0317JUD003450697https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-68541
Cifuentes Elegueta v. Chile
Cifuentes Elegueta v. Chile CCPR/C/96/D/1536/2006 Communication number s : 1536/2006 Author: Mar a Cifuentes Elegueta Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Chile Submission date 23 Sep 2006 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1536/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1504/en-US
Djebbar and Chihoub v. Algeria
Djebbar and Chihoub v. Algeria CCPR/C/103/D/1811/2008 Communication number s : 1811/2008 Author: Taous Djebbar and Saadi Chihoub Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Algeria Submission date 25 Aug 2008 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1811/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1227/en-US
El Hassy v. Libya
El Hassy v. Libya CCPR/C/91/D/1422/2005 Communication number s : 1422/2005 Author: Edriss El Hassy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country Libya Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 24 Oct 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1422/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1384/en-US
F.E.C. v. Spain
F.E.C. v. Spain CCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020 Communication number s : 3810/2020 Author: F.E.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Spain Submission date 19 Nov 2019 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3810/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3246/en-US
Flamer-Caldera v. Sri Lanka
Flamer Caldera v. Sri Lanka CEDAW/C/81/D/134/2018 Communication number s : 134/2018 Author: Rosanna Flamer Caldera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 23 Aug 2018 Date of decision 21 Feb 2022 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/81/D/134/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3047/en-US
G.C.A.A. v. Uruguay
G.C.A.A. v. Uruguay CCPR/C/115/D/2358/2014 Communication number s : 2358/2014 Author: G.C.A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country Uruguay Submission date 16 Mar 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2358/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2090/en-US
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico
Hidalgo Rea v. Mexico CCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018 Communication number s : 3259/2018 Author: Irma Leticia Hidalgo Rea Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Mexico Submission date 15 Jan 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3259/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3227/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Oman, Austria, and Rwanda
8 July 2021 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Oman Austria and Rwanda. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Oman were Nepal Pakistan Philippines Qatar Russian Federation Saudi Arabia UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-oman-austria
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Saint Lucia, Oman and Austria
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 7 June 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Saint Lucia Oman and Austria.Donatus Keith St. Aimee Permanent Representative of Saint Lucia to the United Nations UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-saint-lucia
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Sudan and Hungary
Human Rights Council MORNING 23 September 2011 Continues General Debate on Human Rights Situations that Require the Council s Attention The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Saint Vincent and the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-saint-vincent