Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3416
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A.A. v. Denmark
A.A. v. Denmark CAT/C/49/D/412/2010 Communication number s : 412/2010 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Denmark Submission date 30 Sep 2009 Date of decision 13 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/49/D/412/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/23/en-US
A.B.V. v. Russia
A.B.V. v. Russia RUS 02/01/2019 00:00:00 24/01/2019 10:13:38 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51193
A.D. v. Cyprus
A.D. v. Cyprus CAT/C/75/D/1065/2021 Communication number s : 1065/2021 Author: A.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Cyprus Submission date 18 Mar 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1065/2021https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3610/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.S. v. Nepal
A.S. v. Nepal CCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011 Communication number s : 2077/2011 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Jul 2011 Date of decision 06 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2077/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2045/en-US
A decency threshold for prisons – criteria for assessing conditions of detention
A decency threshold for prisons criteria for assessing conditions of detention fcn fk fkm fkmh fkmv fkrg fmpm ftb 2021 05 06 2018 04 19 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT CPT/Inf 2021 5 CPTCPT/Inf(2021)5-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2021-5-part-en
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey
ADIYAMAN v. Turkey TUR 09/01/2018 00:00:00 12/01/2018 10:16:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified and disproportionate interference due to disciplinary sanctions imposed on prisoners for having expressed peaceful opinions. Article 10 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48589
AFET SUREYYA EREN v. Turkey
AFET SUREYYA EREN v. Turkey TUR 14/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:22:11 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment / actions of security forces: Ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36701
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AFGHANISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 NULL 2017 06 12T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/AFG/CO/2 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 12 June 2017 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/AFG/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f8a1c4a3-5be3-4e9a-b9fc-86481147aa50
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia
AGANIKYAN v. Armenia ARM 05/04/2018 00:00:00 18/04/2018 09:59:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49313
AKAR v. Turkey
AKAR v. Turkey TUR 21/09/2011 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:26:10 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unjustified interference of prison authorities with the applicants correspondence in general due to the lacking clarity of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35071
AKSOY v. Turkey
AKSOY v. Turkey TUR 30/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference due to the imposition of solitary confinement as a disciplinary punishment by the Prison Disciplinary Boards for having used the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48833
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of disciplinary punishments eleven days of solitary confinement imposed under the Regulations on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55167
ALBANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ALBANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CED/C/ALB/CO/1 NULL 2018 07 03T00:00:00 CED United Nations CED/C/ALB/CO/1 Distr.: General International Convention for the Protection of All Persons 3 July 2018 from Enforced Disappearance Original: English Committee on UHRICED/C/ALB/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5e2915c9-9987-4e07-b60f-2e7263b4d294