Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 241 - 260 of 522
CASE OF LÓPEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
CASE OF L PEZ RIBALDA AND OTHERS v. SPAIN 1874/13 8567/13 GONZALES ESPADA J.A. ESP 10/17/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 8 Right to respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1017JUD000187413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-197098
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY
CASE OF LABITA v. ITALY 26772/95 N/A ITA 4/6/2000 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 with regard to alleged ill treatment Violation of Art. 3 with regard to lack of effective investigation No violation of Art. 3 with regard to conditions of transfer ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406JUD002677295https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58559
CASE OF LADENT v. POLAND
CASE OF LADENT v. POLAND 11036/03 HINCKER L. POL 3/18/2008 12:00:00 AM Violations of Art. 5 1 Violation of Art. 5 2 Violation of Art. 5 3 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim rejected Non pecuniary damage award Code of Criminal Procedure Articles ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD001103603https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85487
CASE OF LAKIĆEVIĆ AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA
CASE OF LAKI EVI AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO AND SERBIA 27458/06 33604/07 37205/06 37207/06 N/A MNE SRB 12/13/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Article 9 1 of the Constitutional Charter ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213JUD002745806https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-107937
CASE OF LANCHID HITEL ES FAKTOR ZRT. v. HUNGARY
CASE OF LANCHID HITEL ES FAKTOR ZRT. v. HUNGARY 40381/05 ASZODI I. HUN 11/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of P1 1 Pecuniary damage award Section 328 of the Old Companies Act 1988 The Old Taxation Order Act 1990 369 509 311 238 354 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD004038105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101560
CASE OF LANGNER v. GERMANY
CASE OF LANGNER v. GERMANY 14464/11 FREIHERR VON WALDENFELS E. DEU 9/17/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Section 53 of the Collective Agreement for Public Service Employees ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0917JUD001446411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157282
CASE OF LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 57818/09 51169/10 4618/11 19700/11 31040/11 47609/11 55306/11 59410/11 7189/12 16128/12 16134/12 20273/12 51540/12 64243/12 37038/13 SHUKHARDIN V. BARTENEV D. ISSAEVA M. TEREKHOV K. RUS 2/7/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD005781809https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170857
CASE OF LEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LEE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 25289/94 GBR 1/18/2001 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of P1 1 No violation of P1 2 No violation of Art. 14 Caravan Sites Act 1968 Ss. 6 10 11 12 16 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Ss. 77 78 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0118JUD002528994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59157
CASE OF LEKAVIČIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF LEKAVI IEN v. LITHUANIA 48427/09 VE I NAS T. LTU 6/27/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Article 8 4 of the Law on the Bar Advokat ros statymas Code of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD004842709https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-174616
CASE OF LEKIĆ v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF LEKI v. SLOVENIA 36480/07 ZDOLSEK S. SACCUCI A. SVN 12/11/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim No ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1211JUD003648007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188268
CASE OF LIBERT v. FRANCE
CASE OF LIBERT v. FRANCE 588/13 BIBARD P. FRA 2/22/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0222JUD000058813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181273
CASE OF LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 13221/08 2139/10 ELGESEM F. FLAATEN S.O. HIKA G. NOR 6/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Respondent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD001322108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111420
CASE OF LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS AND JULY v. FRANCE
CASE OF LINDON OTCHAKOVSKY LAURENS AND JULY v. FRANCE 21279/02 36448/02 LECLERC H. RAPPAPORT R. FRA 10/22/2007 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 6 1 Sections 29 32 1 and 42 of the Freedom of the Press Act of 29 July 1881 149 105 148 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1022JUD002127902https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-82846
CASE OF LIU v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
CASE OF LIU v. RUSSIA No. 2 29157/09 RACHKOVSKIY M. RUS 7/26/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award Code of Administrative Offences 26 1 451 425 203 268 262 333 329 354 238 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD002915709https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105764
CASE OF LUCZAK v. POLAND
CASE OF LUCZAK v. POLAND 77782/01 BUBAK M. POL 11/27/2007 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage financial award total Costs and expenses partial award Convention domestic proceedings Constitution Art. 37 67 1 Law on ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD007778201https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83464
CASE OF LUKATS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF LUKATS v. ROMANIA 24199/07 ROU 4/5/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions Law no. 165/2013 Law ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD002419907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161945
CASE OF M.A.K. AND R.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF M.A.K. AND R.K. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 45901/05 40146/06 SYKES J. MOLE N. GBR 3/23/2010 12:00:00 AM Reminder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Section 8 of the Family Reform Act 1969 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323JUD004590105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97880
CASE OF M. AND C. v. ROMANIA
CASE OF M. AND C. v. ROMANIA 29032/04 CRANGARIU E. ROU 9/27/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 procedural aspect Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 14 6 Non pecuniary damage award Article 180 1 and 3 of the Romanian Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD002903204https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106433
CASE OF M.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF M.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 51220/13 CRAGG S. GBR 3/30/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 1 Six month period Article 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Ratione personae No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0330JUD005122013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208876
CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. MALTA
CASE OF M.D. AND OTHERS v. MALTA 64791/10 BRINCAT J. MLT 7/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0717JUD006479110https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112206