Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3921 - 3940 of 4966
Gelle v. Denmark
Gelle v. Denmark CERD/C/68/D/34/2004 Communication number s : 034/2004 Author: Mohammed Hassan Gelle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 17 May 2004 Date of decision 06 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/68/D/34/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1737/en-US
Gemma Beasley v. Australia
Gemma Beasley v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/11/2013 Communication number s : 011/2013 Author: Gemma Beasley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 29 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/11/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2142/en-US
Gilberg v. Germany
Gilberg v. Germany CCPR/C/87/D/1403/2005 Communication number s : 1403/2005 Author: Erich Gilberg Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 87 Country Germany Submission date 11 Feb 2005 Date of decision 25 Jul 2006 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1403/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1266/en-US
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania
Gintaras Jagminas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015 Communication number s : 2670/2015 Author: Gintaras Jagminas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2670/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2795/en-US
Giri v. Nepal
Giri v. Nepal CCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008 Communication number s : 1761/2008 Author: Yubraj Giri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Jan 2008 Date of decision 24 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1664/en-US
Gnaneswaran v. Australia
Gnaneswaran v. Australia CCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018 Communication number s : 3212/2018 Author: Thileepan Gnaneswaran Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 133 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2018 Date of decision 27 Oct 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/133/D/3212/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3155/en-US
Gomaríz Valera v. Spain
Gomar z Valera v. Spain CCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002 Communication number s : 1095/2002 Author: Bernardino Gomar z Valera Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Spain Submission date 04 Sep 1997 Date of decision 22 Jul 2005 Comment: An JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1095/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1191/en-US
Gonzalez v. Guyana
Gonzalez v. Guyana CCPR/C/98/D/1246/2004 Communication number s : 1246/2004 Author: Patricia Angela Gonzalez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Guyana Submission date 14 Dec 2003 Date of decision 25 Mar 2010 Comment: The text on an JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1246/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1555/en-US
Gordon v. Jamaica
Gordon v. Jamaica CCPR/C/46/D/237/1987 Communication number s : 237/1987 Author: Denroy Gordon Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Jamaica Submission date 29 May 1987 Date of decision 05 Nov 1992 Comment: on 2 November 1987 and on JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/237/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/444/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Cyprus
Government comments on the fourth report on Cyprus CYP 2011 03 23 2011 05 31 Government comments on the report on CYPRUS APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRICYP-COM-IV-2011-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-IV-2011-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Estonia
Government comments on the fourth report on Estonia EST 2009 12 15 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on ESTONIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRIEST-COM-IV-2010-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=EST-COM-IV-2010-003-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Hungary
Government comments on the fourth report on Hungary HUN 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on HUNGARY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Hungary ECRI ECRIHUN-COM-IV-2009-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=HUN-COM-IV-2009-003-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia
Government comments on the fourth report on Latvia LVA 2011 12 09 2012 02 21 Government comments on the report on LATVIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRILVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LVA-COM-IV-2012-003-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Lithuania
Government comments on the fourth report on Lithuania LTU 2011 06 22 2011 09 13 Government comments on the report on LITHUANIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning ECRILTU-COM-IV-2011-038-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=LTU-COM-IV-2011-038-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom GBR 2009 01 17 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on THE UNITED KINGDOM APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and ECRIGBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Belgium
Government comments on the second report on Belgium BEL 1999 06 18 2000 03 21 APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its second report on Belgium is dated 18 June 1999 and that any subsequent development is not taken into ECRIBEL-COM-II-2000-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BEL-COM-II-2000-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
Govsha, Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus
Govsha Syritsa and Mezyak v. Belarus CCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008 Communication number s : 1790/2008 Author: Sergei Govsha Viktor Syritsa and Viktor Mezyak Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Belarus Submission date 31 Mar 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1790/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1246/en-US
Goyet v. France
Goyet v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1746/2008 Communication number s : 1746/2008 Author: Farida Goyet Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1746/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1468/en-US