Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 141 - 160 of 9896
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands
B.W.M.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008 Communication number s : 1788/2008 Author: B.W.M.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Netherlands Submission date 26 Jun 2007 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: Pursuant to JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1788/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1331/en-US
BAARS v. the Netherlands
BAARS v. the Netherlands NLD 28/01/2004 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the denial of costs and compensation for pre trial detention after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4499
BAJIC v. Croatia
BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133
BEG S.P.A. v. Italy
BEG S.P.A. v. Italy ITA 20/08/2021 00:00:00 03/09/2021 15:13:59 Case Description: This case concerns the unfairness of voluntary arbitration proceedings which ended in 2002 due to the lack of impartiality of an arbitrator top official and counsel of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58315
BELASHEV v. Russia
BELASHEV v. Russia RUS 05/04/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to a public hearing in criminal proceedings on account of the domestic courts failure to properly motivate their decisions to held the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13765
BERECZKI v. Romania
BERECZKI v. Romania ROU 26/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of impartiality of the county court which had examined and dismissed in 2007 the administrative action brought by the applicant against the judicial experts office on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13167
BOCHAN v. Ukraine
BOCHAN v. Ukraine UKR 03/08/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal in civil proceedings on account of the repeated reassignment EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31326
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
BRLETIC v. Croatia
BRLETIC v. Croatia HRV 16/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of res judicata by a second set of civil proceedings related to salary arrears owed which resulted in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10137
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
BRUNET v. France
BRUNET v. France FRA 18/12/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:16:33 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of a real possibility for seeking deletion of information recorded in a crime database despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30069
BULANOV v. Ukraine
BULANOV v. Ukraine UKR 09/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the Supreme Court s and Higher Administrative Court s refusals to accept jurisdiction and to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31639
BUNTOV v. Russia
BUNTOV v. Russia RUS 09/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases in this group mainly concern torture and ill treatment inflicted in the penitentiary facilities and their ineffective investigation substantive and procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14152
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US