Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4201 - 4220 of 5304
Paksas v. Lithuania
Paksas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012 Communication number s : 2155/2012 Author: Rolandas Paksas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2155/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1819/en-US
Pohl et al. v. Austria
Pohl et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003 Communication number s : 1160/2003 Author: Godfried and Ingrid Pohl Wolfgang Mayer Franz Wallmann Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 23 Sep 2002 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1160/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1114/en-US
Poplavny, Sudalenko v. Belarus
Poplavny Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012 Communication number s : 2139/2012 Author: Poplavny Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Feb 2012 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2129/en-US
Protocol amending the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (CETS No. 208)
Protocol amending the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters CETS No. 208 208 Paris 2010 05 27T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty ETS 127 Paris 2011 06 01T00:00:00 Ratification by 5 States Parties to the COECETS No. 208https://rm.coe.int/168008482b
Protsko et al v. Belarus
Protsko et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015 CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016 Communication number s : 2897/2016 2909/2016 2910/2016 2915/2016 2712/2015 Author: Aleksandr Protsko and Eduard Nelyubovich Yury Lyashenko Natalya Shchukina Vladimir Katsora And Type JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015, CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3646/en-US
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
Q. v. Denmark v. Denmark
Q. v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/113/D/2001/2010 Communication number s : 2001/2010 Author: Q. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Jul 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2001/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1923/en-US
QATAR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
QATAR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/QAT/CO/17 21 NULL 2019 01 02T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/QAT/CO/17 21 International Convention onthe Elimination of All Distr.: General Formsof Racial Discrimination 2 January 2019 Original: English Committee UHRICERD/C/QAT/CO/17-21https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/754feef7-30ae-4d6c-800e-07036dcf4292
Quelch v. Jamaica
Quelch v. Jamaica CCPR/C/46/D/292/1988 Communication number s : 292/1988 Author: Delroy Quelch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Jamaica Submission date 08 Jul 1988 Date of decision 23 Oct 1992 Comment: on 8 July 1988 a rule 86 JUTBCCPR/C/46/D/292/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/302/en-US
R.A. v. Kazakhstan
R.A. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/134/D/2698/2015 Communication number s : 2698/2015 Author: R.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 04 Dec 2015 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2698/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3146/en-US
R.M. v. Finland
R.M. v. Finland CCPR/C/35/D/301/1988 Communication number s : 301/1988 Author: R.M. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Finland Submission date 14 Jun 1988 Date of decision 23 Mar 1989 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/301/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/574/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia
R.R. AND R.D. v. Slovakia SVK 01/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations related to excessive use of force by the police failure to protect physical well being of persons in police custody EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56501
R.R.L. et al. v. Canada
R.R.L. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/61/D/659/2015 Communication number s : 659/2015 Author: R.R.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Canada Submission date 02 Feb 2015 Date of decision 10 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of non violation. JUTBCAT/C/61/D/659/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2219/en-US
RADANOVIC v. Croatia
RADANOVIC v. Croatia HRV 21/03/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the applicants inability to repossess property for a prolonged period of time as a result of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10079
RADOVICI AND STANESCU v. Romania
RADOVICI AND STANESCU v. Romania ROU 02/02/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with property rights: Extension of lease agreed with former laNLDord with no rent paid for several years to the new owner as a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17500
RAGUZ v. Croatia
RAGUZ v. Croatia HRV 10/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice / right to marry: Excessive length of civil including divorce and paternity proceedings and interference with the right to marry EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10081
RAICHINOV v. Bulgaria
RAICHINOV v. Bulgaria BGR 20/07/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the sentencing of a high rank official following ex officio prosecution to a fine and a public reprimand for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14631
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan AZE 01/05/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of of the right to freedom of association on account of the authorities a unlawful de facto refusals to register the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1607
RAMOS FERREIRA AND OTHERS v. Portugal
RAMOS FERREIRA AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 09/12/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with property rights: Excessive delay in determining and paying compensation following the expropriation of agricultural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9987