Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
CASE OF A.S.N. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.S.N. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 68377/17 530/18 VAN HAREN F.L.M. NLD 2/25/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Afghanistan 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717 FOURTH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201330
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 6/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Violation of Article 10 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF CHAHAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22414/93 N/A GBR 11/15/1996 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 4 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 5 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1115JUD002241493https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58004
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 57325/00 LORD LESTER OF HERNE HILL QC GOLDSTON J. STRUPEK D. CZE 11/13/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 14 P1 2 General measures refused ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD005732500https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83256
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND 10593/08 MCBRIDE J. CHE 9/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0912JUD001059308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CASE OF SHARMA v. LATVIA
CASE OF SHARMA v. LATVIA 28026/05 CASTELINO A. LVA 3/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 7 Procedural ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0324JUD002802605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161540
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE
CASE OF SILIADIN v. FRANCE 73316/01 CLEMENT H. FRA 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and rejected victim Violation of Art. 4 Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Criminal Code former Articles 225 13 225 14 Information ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD007331601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69891
G.R. v. Australia
G.R. v. Australia CAT/C/57/D/605/2014 Communication number s : 605/2014 Author: G.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2014 Date of decision 13 May 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/57/D/605/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3008/en-US
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by the United Kingdom
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by the United Kingdom GBR 2012 09 12 Government s Comments The following comments do not form part of GRETA s analysis concerning the GRETAGBR-COM-1-2012-6-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-1-2012-6-ENG
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by the United Kingdom
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by the United Kingdom GBR 2012 06 29 2012 09 12 G R E T A Group of Experts on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings GRETA 2012 6 GRETAGBR-REP-1-2012-6-ENG-1https://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-REP-1-2012-6-ENG-1
Singh v. France
Singh v. France CCPR/C/106/D/1852/2008 Communication number s : 1852/2008 Author: Bikramjit Singh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 2008 Date of decision 01 Nov 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1852/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1655/en-US
Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2004/48/Add.2 from 31 August 2003 to 13 September 2003 4 March 2004 Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living and on the right to non discrimination in this context UNSPE/CN.4/2004/48/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2004%2f48%2fAdd.2&Lang=en