Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3841 - 3860 of 3871
Gelle v. Denmark
Gelle v. Denmark CERD/C/68/D/34/2004 Communication number s : 034/2004 Author: Mohammed Hassan Gelle Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 17 May 2004 Date of decision 06 Mar 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/68/D/34/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1737/en-US
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden
J.D.P. and K.E.P. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016 Communication number s : 2743/2016 Author: J.D.P. and K.E.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2743/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2846/en-US
J.D. v. Czech Republic
J.D. v. Czech Republic CEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016 Communication number s : 102/2016 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Czech Republic Submission date 17 Feb 2016 Date of decision 16 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/102/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2659/en-US
Kadirić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Kadiri v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/115/D/2048/2011 Communication number s : 2048/2011 Author: Emira Kadiri and Dino Kadiri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 24 Jan 2011 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2048/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2088/en-US
L.R. v. Republic of Moldova
L.R. v. Republic of Moldova CEDAW/C/66/D/58/2013 Communication number s : 58/2013 Author: L.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 01 Sep 2011 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/58/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3033/en-US
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary
LOKPO AND TOURE v. Hungary HUN 08/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning the asylum seeking applicants detention violations of Article 5 1 . In Lokpo and Tour Al Tayyar Abdelhakim and Said in 2009 and 2010 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10637
Laptsevich v. Belarus
Laptsevich v. Belarus CCPR/C/68/D/780/1997 Communication number s : 780/1997 Author: Vladimir Petrovich Laptsevich Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Belarus Submission date 18 Aug 1997 Date of decision 20 Mar 2000 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/68/D/780/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/895/en-US
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015 Communication number s : 2535/2015 Author: Lukpan Akhmedyarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2860/en-US
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine
MAKSYMENKO AND GERASYMENKO v. Ukraine UKR 16/08/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the domestic courts to examine the proportionality of the interference with the applicants property rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32248
MEIMANIS v. Latvia
MEIMANIS v. Latvia LVA 21/10/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to interception of telephone conversations without the ex post facto judicial approval for the interception of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12694
MILJEVIC v. Croatia
MILJEVIC v. Croatia HRV 25/09/2020 00:00:00 15/10/2020 16:39:02 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants freedom of expression due to convictions imposed in 2009 2012 for defamation Article 200 of the Criminal Code EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56053
MORRIS* v. the United Kingdom
MORRIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2592
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands
Mohamed Rabbae v. Netherlands CCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011 Communication number s : 2124/2011 Author: Mohamed Rabbae Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Netherlands Submission date 15 Nov 2011 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2124/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2153/en-US
N.K. v. Norway
N.K. v. Norway CEDAW/C/65/D/74/2014 Communication number s : 74/2014 Author: N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Norway Submission date 27 Dec 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/74/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3447/en-US
Osmani v. Serbia
Osmani v. Serbia CAT/C/42/D/261/2005 Communication number s : 261/2005 Author: Besim Osmani Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 42 Country Serbia Submission date 17 Dec 2004 Date of decision 08 May 2009 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/42/D/261/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/68/en-US
POCUCA v. Croatia
POCUCA v. Croatia HRV 29/09/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and lack of effective remedy: Excessive length of pension proceedings before administrative authorities and courts as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10351
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS, GABRIELA KNAUL. ADDENDUM. MISSION TO PAKISTAN
REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE INDEPENDENCE OF JUDGES AND LAWYERS GABRIELA KNAUL. ADDENDUM. MISSION TO PAKISTAN A/HRC/23/43/Add.2 NULL 2013 04 04T00:00:00 SR Independence of judges United Nations A/HRC/23/43/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General UHRIA/HRC/23/43/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/feeea0b9-d135-43bd-813a-e0aa6266f0a4
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by the United Kingdom
Report concerning the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings by the United Kingdom GBR 2012 09 12 Government s Comments The following comments do not form part of GRETA s analysis concerning the GRETAGBR-COM-1-2012-6-ENGhttps://hudoc.greta.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-1-2012-6-ENG
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
SADAK AND OTHERS v. Turkey (no. 2)
SADAK AND OTHERS v. Turkey no. 2 TUR 06/11/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Electoral rights: Disproportionate interference due to the automatic deprivation of parlamentarians of their mandates following the dissolution of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5478