Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4521 - 4540 of 5073
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND CRC/C/GBR/CO/4 NULL 2008 10 20T06:00:00 CRC UNITED NATIONS CRC Distr. GENERAL Convention UHRICRC/C/GBR/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/091b9fe4-fd24-4170-9251-6af52934d058
CRC/C/GBR/CO/5 United Kingdom
CRC/C/GBR/CO/5 United Kingdom CRC/C/GBR/CO/5 NULL 2016 07 12T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/GBR/CO/5 Distr.: General 12 July 2016 Convention on theRights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations on the UHRICRC/C/GBR/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b6cf22f9-7755-4865-8fa7-125173502636
CROATIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
CROATIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/HRV/CO/5 6 NULL 2022 06 22T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/HRV/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 22 June 2022 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/HRV/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/af15e641-e14d-43c6-96b1-02a55f7ca2a1
Camara v. Canada
Camara v. Canada CCPR/C/90/D/1365/2005 Communication number s : 1365/2005 Author: Souleymane Camara Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 90 Country Canada Submission date 25 May 2004 Date of decision 24 Jul 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1365/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1402/en-US
Carlos Moreno Zamora et al. v. Mexico
Carlos Moreno Zamora et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/127/D/2760/2016 Communication number s : 2760/2016 Author: Carlos Moreno Zamora Mar a Enriqueta P rez Barrera and Areli Moreno P rez on their own behalf and on behalf of Jes s Israel Moreno P rez their missing JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2760/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2802/en-US
Carrión Barcaiztegui v. Spain
Carri n Barcaiztegui v. Spain CCPR/C/80/D/1019/2001 Communication number s : 1019/2001 Author: Mercedes Carri n Barcaiztegui Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 08 Mar 2001 Date of decision 20 Mar 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1019/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1105/en-US
Chadee et al. v. Trinidad and Tobago
Chadee et al. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/63/D/813/1998 Communication number s : 813/1998 Author: Dole Chadee et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 01 Apr 1998 Date of decision 29 Jul 1998 JUTBCCPR/C/63/D/813/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/363/en-US
Chiti v. Zambia
Chiti v. Zambia CCPR/C/105/D/1303/2004 Communication number s : 1303/2004 Author: Joyce Nawila Chiti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Zambia Submission date 26 Jul 2004 Date of decision 26 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1303/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1424/en-US
Christian Nekvedavičius v. Lithuania
Christian Nekvedavi ius v. Lithuania CCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016 Communication number s : 2802/2016 Author: Christian Nekvedavi ius Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Lithuania Submission date 24 Jul 2014 Date of decision 09 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2802/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2364/en-US
Claude Ory v. France
Claude Ory v. France CCPR/C/110/D/1960/2010 Communication number s : 1960/2010 Author: Claude Ory Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country France Submission date 01 Apr 2010 Date of decision 28 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1960/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1811/en-US
Cochet v. France
Cochet v. France CCPR/C/100/D/1760/2008/REV.1 Communication number s : 1760/2008 Author: Jean Pierre Cochet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country France Submission date 04 Dec 2007 Date of decision 21 Oct 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1760/2008/REV.1https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3224/en-US
Coleman v. Australia
Coleman v. Australia CCPR/C/87/D/1157/2003 Communication number s : 1157/2003 Author: Patrick Coleman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Australia Submission date 14 Jan 2003 Date of decision 17 Jul 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1157/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1277/en-US
Comments of UNMIK on the Third Opinion on Kosovo*
Comments of UNMIK on the Third Opinion on Kosovo SRBKOS GVT/COM/III 2013 005 Strasbourg 10 September 2013 Public GVT/COM/III 2013 005 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS BY THE UNITED NATIONS FCNMGVT/COM/III(2013)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_Com_Kosovo_en
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Estonia
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Estonia EST GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2002 005 20 February 2002 GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2002 005 Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Comments of the Government of FCNMGVT/COM/INF/OP/I(2002)005https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_Com_Estonia_en
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Germany
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Germany 19 July 2002 GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2002 008 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS BY THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ON THE OPINION OF THE FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_Com_Germany_en
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Serbia and Montenegro
Comments of the Government on the First Opinion on Serbia and Montenegro SCG GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2004 002 Strasbourg 29 April 2004 GVT/COM/INF/OP/I 2004 002 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES COMMENTS OF FCNMGVT/COM/INF/OP/I(2004)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_Com_SerbiaMontenegro_en
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on "The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
Comments of the Government on the Fourth Opinion on The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKDMDN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Strasbourg 20 December 2016 GVT/COM/IV 2016 006 Comments of the FCNMhttps://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_Com_FYROM_en
Conclusions 2002 - Slovenia - Article 1-2
Conclusions 2002 Slovenia Article 1 2 SVN 01 02 000 31/03/2002 31/03/2002 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects Article 49 of the Slovenian Constitution of 1991 guarantees ESC2002/def/SVN/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2002/def/SVN/1/2/EN
Conclusions 2013 - Romania - Article 13-1
Conclusions 2013 Romania Article 13 1 ROU 13 01 000 06/12/2013 18/12/2013 Article 13 Right to social and medical assistance Paragraph 1 Adequate assistance for every person in need The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report ESC2013/def/ROU/13/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2013/def/ROU/13/1/EN
Conclusions 2014 - Bosnia and Herzegovina - Article 6-4
Conclusions 2014 Bosnia and Herzegovina Article 6 4 BIH 06 04 000 05/12/2014 08/12/2014 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 4 Collective action The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Bosnia and ESC2014/def/BIH/6/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2014/def/BIH/6/4/EN