Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4561 - 4580 of 5073
Conclusions XX-2 - United Kingdom - Article 13-1
Conclusions XX 2 United Kingdom Article 13 1 GBR 13 01 000 06/12/2013 07/01/2014 Article 13 Right to social and medical assistance Paragraph 1 Adequate assistance for every person in need The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report ESCXX-2/def/GBR/13/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-2/def/GBR/13/1/EN
Crippa et al. v. France
Crippa et al. v. France CCPR/C/85/D/993 995/2001 Communication number s : 995/2001 993/2001 Author: Gabriel Crippa Jean Louis Masson and Marie Joe Zimmermann Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 85 Country France Submission date 01 Sep JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/993-995/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1230/en-US
D.B. v. Netherlands
D.B. v. Netherlands CAT/C/72/D/824/2017 Communication number s : 824/2017 Author: D.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Netherlands Submission date 17 May 2017 Date of decision 19 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/824/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3113/en-US
D.C. v. Switzerland
D.C. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/889/2018 Communication number s : 889/2018 Author: D.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/73/D/889/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3334/en-US
D.F. v. Australia
D.F. v. Australia CERD/C/72/D/39/2006 Communication number s : 039/2006 Author: D.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 Oct 2006 Date of decision 22 Feb 2008 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCERD/C/72/D/39/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1730/en-US
D.L. v. Sweden
D.L. v. Sweden CRPD/C/17/D/31/2015 Communication number s : 031/2015 Author: D.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 17 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Jul 2015 Date of decision 24 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/17/D/31/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2330/en-US
D.L. v. Sweden
D.L. v. Sweden CRPD/C/17/D/31/2015 Communication number s : 031/2015 Author: D.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 17 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Jul 2015 Date of decision 24 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/17/D/31/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2385/en-US
D.M. v. Australia
D.M. v. Australia CAT/C/58/D/595/2014 Communication number s : 595/2014 Author: D.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2014 Date of decision 08 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/595/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3013/en-US
D.V.K. v. Kazakhstan
D.V.K. v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/132/D/2675/2015 Communication number s : 2675/2015 Author: D.V.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 20 May 2015 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2675/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3173/en-US
D.Z. v. Switzerland
D.Z. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/790/2016 Communication number s : 790/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 01 Dec 2016 Date of decision 27 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/790/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3353/en-US
D and E v. Australia
D and E v. Australia CCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002 Communication number s : 1050/2002 Author: D and E and their two children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2002 Date of decision 11 Jul 2006 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1275/en-US
Déogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi
D ogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi CAT/C/53/D/514/2012 Communication number s : 514/2012 Author: D ogratias Niyonzima represented by Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Burundi Submission date 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/514/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2058/en-US
DADIANI AND MACHABELI v. Georgia
DADIANI AND MACHABELI v. Georgia GEO 12/09/2012 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:08:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement of a final domestic decision concerning the restitution of a plot of land due to excessive EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3383
DJIDROVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
DJIDROVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 24/05/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to the unjustified quashing by the Supreme Court of domestic court judgments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5022
Dalisa Dovadzija and Sakiba Dovdzija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Dalisa Dovadzija and Sakiba Dovdzija v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/114/D/2143/2012 Communication number s : 2143/2012 Author: TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2143/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2004/en-US
Dauphin v. Canada
Dauphin v. Canada CCPR/C/96/D/1792/2008 Communication number s : 1792/2008 Author: John Micha l Dauphin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Canada Submission date 29 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: Under article 92 of JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1792/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1550/en-US
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
De Vos v. Netherlands
De Vos v. Netherlands CCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003 Communication number s : 1192/2003 Author: M. de Vos Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Netherlands Submission date 06 Aug 2002 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/982/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, Complaint No. 82/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France Complaint No. 82/2012 FRA 16 00 000 30 00 163 91 175 163 91 212 163 19/03/2013 15/07/2013 European Committee of ESCcc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Union syndicale des magistrats administratifs (USMA) v. France, Complaint No. 84/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Union syndicale des magistrats administratifs USMA v. France Complaint No. 84/2012 FRA 04 02 000 02/12/2013 02/04/2014 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON ESCcc-84-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-84-2012-dadmissandmerits-en