Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 3759
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
3rd General Report on GREVIO’s activities
3rd General Report on GREVIO s activities 2022 06 14 2022 06 14 cyclePhraseHere Publication date: 14/06/2022 3rd GENERAL REPORT ON GREVIO S ACTIVITIES GREVIO Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence covering the GREVIO3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOChttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_General_Report_ENG_HUDOC
A. A. M. v. Sweden
A. A. M. v. Sweden SWE 03/07/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s expulsion to parts of Iraq situated outside the Kurdistan region. Status of Execution: On 16/08/2015 the Migration Agency EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2200
A.A. v. Belgium
A.A. v. Belgium BEL 26/09/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:18:10 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / expulsion: Risk of ill treatment in case of a rejected asylum seeker s deportation to Pakistan. Articles 3 procedural limb and 13 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54103
A.A. v. Switzerland
A.A. v. Switzerland CHE 02/05/2020 00:00:00 19/02/2020 17:13:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment of an asylum seeker in the case of his deportation to Afghanistan lack of a rigorous and thorough examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54771
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
A. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 19/02/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention under Part 4 of the Anti Terrorism Crime and Security Act 2001 allowing the detention pending EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2888
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A.I. v. Switzerland
A.I. v. Switzerland CHE 30/08/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / deportation: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation to Sudan of an asylum seeker who had carried on political activities in exile. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47707
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan
A. K. and A. R. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003 Communication number s : 1233/2003 Author: A. K. and A. R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Jul 2003 Date of decision 31 Mar 2009 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1015/en-US
A.K. v. Latvia
A.K. v. Latvia LVA 24/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:33:08 Case Description: Protection of private life: Procedural shortcomings in compensation proceedings on account of the applicant s gynaecologist s alleged medical negligence in antenatal care. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31192
A.K. v. Liechtenstein
A.K. v. Liechtenstein LIE 09/10/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:30:30 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Objectively justified doubts in respect of the impartiality of the five judges in view of the procedure they had chosen to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-91
A.K. v. Turkey
A.K. v. Turkey TUR 09/01/2019 00:00:00 27/02/2019 14:15:25 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of effective protection on account of the courts failure to conduct criminal investigations within a reasonable time into an attack of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51633
A.M.M. v. Romania
A.M.M. v. Romania ROU 14/05/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure by the domestic courts to strike a fair balance between a child s right to have his interests safeguarded in paternity EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17141
A.M. v. France
A.M. v. France FRA 12/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Inability to contest the lawfulness of an alien s arrest and administrative detention pending enforcement of a deportation order as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39571
A.M. v. Italy
A.M. v. Italy ITA 14/03/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings resulting in the applicant s conviction on the basis of testimony obtained in the US before trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-43007
A.N. v. Lithuania
A.N. v. Lithuania LTU 31/08/2016 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of private life: Absence of proper procedural safeguards in proceedings to deprive a person suffering from mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4347
A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
A.O. FALUN DAFA AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: Freedom of religion and freedom of association: Breach on account of the banning of the applicant organisations symbols followed by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58677
A.P., GARCON AND NICOT v. France
A.P. GARCON AND NICOT v. France FRA 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the second and third applicants due to refusal of transgender persons requests to have EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47539
A.P.J. v. Denmark
A.P.J. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013 Communication number s : 2253/2013 Author: A.P.J. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2013 Date of decision 16 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2253/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2266/en-US