Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25
CASE OF AKTIVA DOO v. SERBIA
CASE OF AKTIVA DOO v. SERBIA 23079/11 KOJI R. SRB 1/19/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Pecuniary damage reserved Article 41 Pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD002307911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207413
CASE OF AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA
CASE OF AMATO GAUCI v. MALTA 47045/06 COMODINI T. REFALO I. MLT 9/15/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of P1 1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Articles 1494 1505 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0915JUD004704506https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-93959
CASE OF BÉLA NÉMETH v. HUNGARY
CASE OF B LA N METH v. HUNGARY 73303/14 TAM S O.V. HUN 12/17/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property No violation of Article 14 P1 1 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007330314https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206514
CASE OF BARCZA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BARCZA AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY 50811/10 CECH A. HUN 10/11/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD005081110https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167109
CASE OF BITTÓ AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF BITT AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA 30255/09 BRICHTA J. SIMAN M. SVK 1/28/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Respondent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128JUD003025509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-140234
CASE OF BRADSHAW AND OTHERS v. MALTA
CASE OF BRADSHAW AND OTHERS v. MALTA 37121/15 CAMILLERI J. MLT 10/23/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1023JUD003712115https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187200
CASE OF BROSSET-TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF BROSSET TRIBOULET AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 34078/02 BLONDEL P. FRA 3/29/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Section 1 of the Coastal Areas Act Former Article A 26 of the State Property Code 238 354 369 62 167 509 311 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003407802https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98036
CASE OF CHABAUTY v. FRANCE
CASE OF CHABAUTY v. FRANCE 57412/08 GENDREAU C. FRA 10/4/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 P1 1 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property General interest Article 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1004JUD005741208https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113715
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF CHASSAGNOU AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 25088/94 28331/95 28443/95 N/A FRA 4/29/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Violation of Art. 14 P1 1 Violation of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 14 11 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0429JUD002508894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58288
CASE OF DEPALLE v. FRANCE
CASE OF DEPALLE v. FRANCE 34044/02 BLONDEL P. FRA 3/29/2010 12:00:00 AM No violation of P1 1 Section 1 of the Coastal Areas Act Former Article A 26 of the Code of State Property 238 354 369 62 167 509 311 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003404402 GRAND CHAMBER ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD003404402https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97978
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY 9300/07 KLEINE COSACK M. DEU 6/26/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD000930007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111690
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HERRMANN v. GERMANY 9300/07 N/A DEU 1/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 No violation of Art. 9 Article 20a of the Basic Law Sections 1 4 6 10 20 and 21 of the Federal Hunting Law Section 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0120JUD000930007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102975
CASE OF LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. NORWAY
CASE OF LINDHEIM AND OTHERS v. NORWAY 13221/08 2139/10 ELGESEM F. FLAATEN S.O. HIKA G. NOR 6/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 Control of the use of property Respondent ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD001322108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111420
CASE OF MEGADAT.COM SRL v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF MEGADAT.COM SRL v. MOLDOVA 21151/04 HANGANU J. MDA 4/8/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Just satisfaction reserved 238 354 369 62 509 311 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0408JUD002115104 FOURTH SECTION CASE OF MEGADAT.COM SRL v. MOLDOVA Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0408JUD002115104https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85732
CASE OF NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
CASE OF NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA 28470/12 R ILEANU A. CURUCI Z. B LAN P. MDA 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD002847012https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216872
CASE OF PANNON PLAKÁT KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
CASE OF PANNON PLAK T KFT AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY 39859/14 LAJER Zs. HUN 12/6/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Remainder inadmissible Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1206JUD003985914https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-221253
CASE OF PENDOV v. BULGARIA
CASE OF PENDOV v. BULGARIA 44229/11 EKIMDZHIEV M. BONCHEVA K. BGR 3/26/2020 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD004422911https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201890
CASE OF ROSINSKI v. POLAND
CASE OF ROSINSKI v. POLAND 17373/02 N/A POL 7/17/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed ratione temporis ratione materiae non exhaustion of domestic remedies Non pecuniary damage financial award Violation of P1 1 Local Planning Acts 1984 1994 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD001737302https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-81737
CASE OF S.A. DANGEVILLE v. FRANCE
CASE OF S.A. DANGEVILLE v. FRANCE 36677/97 N/A FRA 4/16/2002 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 P1 1 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0416JUD003667797https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60432
CASE OF SAKSKOBURGGOTSKI AND CHROBOK v. BULGARIA
CASE OF SAKSKOBURGGOTSKI AND CHROBOK v. BULGARIA 38948/10 8954/17 EKIMDZHIEV M. BONCHEVA K. HRISTOVA E. BGR 9/7/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907JUD003894810https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-211780