Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 57
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A. R. and A. A. v. Canada
A. R. and A. A. v. Canada CAT/C/72/D/898/2018 Communication number s : 898/2018 Author: A. R. and A. A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2018 Date of decision 03 Dec 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCAT/C/72/D/898/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3112/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF EL HASKI v. BELGIUM
CASE OF EL HASKI v. BELGIUM 649/08 MARCHAND Ch. BEL 9/25/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Non pecuniary damage award 350 90 193 445 76 136 14 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD000064908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113445
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF ŠILIH v. SLOVENIA
CASE OF ILIH v. SLOVENIA 71463/01 GRUBAR B. SVN 4/9/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed ratione temporis Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD007146301https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-92142
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND 10593/08 MCBRIDE J. CHE 9/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0912JUD001059308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118
CASE OF OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OTHMAN ABU QATADA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8139/09 PEIRCE G. FITZGERALD E. QC HUSAIN R. QC FRIEDMAN D. GBR 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Jordan No violation of Article 3 13 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD000813909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108629
CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY
CASE OF PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY 25358/12 SPINOSI P. ITA 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for private life Private International Law Act Law no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170359
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24724/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002472494https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58593
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24888/94 N/A GBR 12/16/1999 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1216JUD002488894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58594
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/199/2002 Communication number s : 199/2002 Author: Hanan Ahmed Fouad Abd El Khalek Attia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 28 Dec 2001 Date of decision 17 Nov 2003 JUTBCAT/C/31/D/199/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/156/en-US
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada
G.P. and G.P. v. Canada CCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017 Communication number s : 3016/2017 Author: G.P. and G.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Canada Submission date 11 Aug 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3016/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3177/en-US
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) BELGIUM
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention BELGIUM BEL a111a a22 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2020)14_Belgium_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2020)14_Belgium_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Giri v. Nepal
Giri v. Nepal CCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008 Communication number s : 1761/2008 Author: Yubraj Giri Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Jan 2008 Date of decision 24 Mar 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1761/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1664/en-US
H.S. v. Canada
H.S. v. Canada CAT/C/68/D/568/2013 Communication number s : 568/2013 Author: H.S. represented by counsel Rajwinder Singh Bhambi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Canada Submission date 16 Nov 2013 Date of decision 15 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/568/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2693/en-US