Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1401 - 1420 of 1805
Polay Campos v. Peru
Polay Campos v. Peru CCPR/C/61/D/577/1994 Communication number s : 577/1994 Author: Rosa Espinoza de Polay Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Peru Submission date 05 Mar 1993 Date of decision 06 Nov 1997 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/61/D/577/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/371/en-US
Poplavny, Sudalenko v. Belarus
Poplavny Sudalenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012 Communication number s : 2139/2012 Author: Poplavny Sudalenko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Belarus Submission date 27 Feb 2012 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2139/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2129/en-US
Postnov v. Belarus
Postnov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014 Communication number s : 2361/2014 Author: Igor Postnov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3108/en-US
Prashanta Kumar Pandey v. Nepal
Prashanta Kumar Pandey v. Nepal CCPR/C/124/D/2413/2014 Communication number s : 2413/2014 Author: Prashanta Kumar Pandey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Nepal Submission date 20 Feb 2014 Date of decision 30 Oct 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2413/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2560/en-US
Preiss v. Czech Republic
Preiss v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/93/D/1497/2006 Communication number s : 1497/2006 Author: Richard Preiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 93 Country Czech Republic Submission date 22 Mar 2006 Date of decision 17 Jul 2008 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1497/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1369/en-US
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, EVALUATION REPORT, NORTH MACEDONIA
Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT NORTH MACEDONIA MKD 2019 03 22 2019 06 27 Adoption: 22 March 2019 Publication: 27 June 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)7-Final-eng-NorthMacedonia-PUBLIC
Protsko and Tolchi v. Belarus
Protsko and Tolchi v. Belarus CCPR/C/109/D/1919 1920/2009 Communication number s : 1919/2009 1920/2009 Author: Alexander Protsko and Andrei Tolchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Aug 2009 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1919-1920/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1691/en-US
Protsko et al v. Belarus
Protsko et al v. Belarus CCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015 CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016 Communication number s : 2897/2016 2909/2016 2910/2016 2915/2016 2712/2015 Author: Aleksandr Protsko and Eduard Nelyubovich Yury Lyashenko Natalya Shchukina Vladimir Katsora And Type JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/2712/2015, CCPR/C/136/D/2897/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3646/en-US
Pryce v. Jamaica
Pryce v. Jamaica CCPR/C/80/D/793/1998 Communication number s : 793/1998 Author: Errol Pryce Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Jamaica Submission date 30 May 1997 Date of decision 15 Mar 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/793/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1030/en-US
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
Pustovalov v. Russian Federation
Pustovalov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/98/D/1232/2003 Communication number s : 1232/2003 Author: Oleg Pustovalov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Nov 2003 Date of decision 23 Mar 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1232/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1554/en-US
Pustovoit v. Ukraine
Pustovoit v. Ukraine CCPR/C/110/D/1405/2005 Communication number s : 1405/2005 Author: Mikhail Pustovoit Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Ukraine Submission date 21 Apr 2005 Date of decision 20 Mar 2013 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1405/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1800/en-US
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US
Quispe Roque v. Peru
Quispe Roque v. Peru CCPR/C/85/D/1125/2002 Communication number s : 1125/2002 Author: Jorge Luis Quispe Roque Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Peru Submission date 17 Jul 2002 Date of decision 21 Oct 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1125/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1234/en-US
R.A.A. and Z. M. v. Denmark
R.A.A. and Z. M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2608/2015 Communication number s : 2608/2015 Author: R.A.A. and Z. M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 08 May 2015 Date of decision 28 Oct 2016 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2608/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2181/en-US
R.A.D.B. v. Colombia
R.A.D.B. v. Colombia CCPR/C/103/D/1800/2008 Communication number s : 1800/2008 Author: R.A.D.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 103 Country Colombia Submission date 19 Jun 2006 Date of decision 31 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1800/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1646/en-US
R.G. et al. v. Sweden
R.G. et al. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/586/2014 Communication number s : 586/2014 Author: R.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/56/D/586/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2068/en-US
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia
R. KACAPOR v. Serbia SRB 07/07/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:52:20 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right of access to a court and the peaceful enjoyment of their property due to non enforcement or delayed enforcement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7246
R.M. and F.M. v. Denmark
R.M. and F.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2685/2015 Communication number s : 2685/2015 Author: R.M. and F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Nov 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2685/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2792/en-US
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago
R.S. v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/684/1996 Communication number s : 684/1996 Author: R.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 13 Mar 1996 Date of decision 02 Apr 2002 Comment: The Committee JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/684/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/954/en-US