Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2781 - 2800 of 2830
Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises
Report to HRC A/HRC/29/28/Add.1 from 18 August 2014 to 27 August 2014 3 June 2015 Working Group on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises Azerbaijan United Nations A/HRC/29/28/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: UNSPA/HRC/29/28/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f29%2f28%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/33/43/Add.3 from 14 March 2016 to 18 March 2016 29 July 2016 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Ukraine United Nations UNSPA/HRC/33/43/Add.3https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f33%2f43%2fAdd.3&Lang=en
Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self-determination
Report to HRC A/HRC/4/42/Add.1 from 21 August 2006 to 25 August 2006 20 February 2007 Working Group on the use of mercenaries as a means of violating human rights and impeding the exercise of the right of peoples to self determination Honduras UNITED UNSPA/HRC/4/42/Add.1https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f4%2f42%2fAdd.1&Lang=en
Wright v. Jamaica
Wright v. Jamaica CCPR/C/45/D/349/1989 Communication number s : 349/1989 Author: Clifton Wright Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Jamaica Submission date 12 Jan 1989 Date of decision 27 Jul 1992 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/349/1989https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/423/en-US
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X, Y, and Z v. Sweden
X Y and Z v. Sweden CAT/C/20/D/61/1996 Communication number s : 061/1996 Author: X Y and Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Sweden Submission date 27 Jun 1996 Date of decision 06 May 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/20/D/61/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/247/en-US
X.Y. v. Hungary
X.Y. v. Hungary HUN 19/06/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Group of cases concerning different violations of the applicants right to liberty and security on account of a their unlawful detention Article 5 1 b their unreasonably long pre EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11104
X.Y. v. Switzerland
X.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/26/D/128/1999 Communication number s : 128/1999 Author: X.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Mar 1999 Date of decision 15 May 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/26/D/128/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/196/en-US
X and Z v. Finland
X and Z v. Finland CAT/C/52/D/485/2011 Communication number s : 483/2011 485/2011 Author: Mr. X and Mr. Z both represented by Marjaana Laine of the Refugee Advice Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Finland Submission date 14 JUTBCAT/C/52/D/485/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3225/en-US
X v. Canada
X v. Canada CAT/C/67/D/791/2016 Communication number s : 791/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Sergei Voronov Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Canada Submission date 08 Dec 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/791/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2678/en-US
X v. Denmark
X v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014 Communication number s : 2389/2014 Author: Helle Holm Thomsen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 12 May 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2061/en-US
X. v. Republic of Korea
X. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009 Communication number s : 1908/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Oct 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1809/en-US
X v. Russian Federation
X v. Russian Federation CAT/C/54/D/542/2013 Communication number s : 542/2013 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Russian Federation Submission date 04 Feb 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/54/D/542/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1955/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/59/D/686/2015 Communication number s : 686/2015 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Switzerland Submission date 02 Jun 2015 Date of decision 05 Dec 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/59/D/686/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2183/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/704/2015 Communication number s : 704/2015 Author: X. represented by counsel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Sep 2015 Date of decision 17 May 2018 Comment: Decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/704/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2742/en-US
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
Y.B.F., S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland
Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/50/D/467/2011 Communication number s : 467/2011 Author: Y.B.F. S.A.Q. and Y.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Jun 2011 Date of decision 31 May 2013 JUTBCAT/C/50/D/467/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3/en-US
Y.M. v. Spain
Y.M. v. Spain CRC/C/78/D/8/2016 Communication number s : 008/2016 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Spain Submission date 16 Dec 2016 Date of decision 31 May 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/78/D/8/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2396/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US