Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1741 - 1760 of 2830
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - SWITZERLAND
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SWITZERLAND CHE a112 a9 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)27_Switzerland_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)27_Switzerland_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) Slovenia
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention Slovenia SVN exe 2021 06 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2021_7_Slovenia_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) TURKEY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention TURKEY TUR a15 a22 a25 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GRZEDA v. Poland
GRZEDA v. Poland POL 15/03/2022 00:00:00 17/03/2022 16:35:22 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court SC EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59933
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria
GUTSANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 15/01/2014 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The majority of the cases in this group concern deaths torture ill treatment excessive use of force or lack of timely medical assistance during arrest in police detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3943
Gayoso Martínez v. Spain
Gayoso Mart nez v. Spain CCPR/C/97/D/1363/2005 Communication number s : 1363/2005 Author: Gerardo Gayoso Mart nez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 97 Country Spain Submission date 29 May 2003 Date of decision 19 Oct 2009 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1363/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1027/en-US
Gbondo Sama v. Germany
Gbondo Sama v. Germany CCPR/C/96/D/1771/2008 Communication number s : 1771/2008 Author: Mohamed Musa Gbondo Sama Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 96 Country Germany Submission date 25 Oct 2005 Date of decision 28 Jul 2009 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1771/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1534/en-US
Gerashchenko v. Belarus
Gerashchenko v. Belarus CCPR/C/97/D/1537/2006 Communication number s : 1537/2006 Author: Yekaterina Gerashchenko Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 97 Country Belarus Submission date 13 Dec 2006 Date of decision 23 Oct 2009 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/97/D/1537/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1024/en-US
Gert Jan Timmer v. Netherlands
Gert Jan Timmer v. Netherlands CCPR/C/111/D/2097/2011 Communication number s : 2097/2011 Author: Gert Jan Timmer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Netherlands Submission date 02 Feb 2011 Date of decision 24 Jul 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2097/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1869/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Gonzales v. Trinidad and Tobago
Gonzales v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/65/D/673/1995 Communication number s : 673/1995 Author: Franklyn Gonzales Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 12 Dec 1994 Date of decision 23 Mar 1999 JUTBCCPR/C/65/D/673/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/767/en-US
Gonzalez v. Guyana
Gonzalez v. Guyana CCPR/C/98/D/1246/2004 Communication number s : 1246/2004 Author: Patricia Angela Gonzalez Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Guyana Submission date 14 Dec 2003 Date of decision 25 Mar 2010 Comment: The text on an JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1246/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1555/en-US
Gougnina v. Uzbekistan
Gougnina v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/92/D/1141/2002 Communication number s : 1141/2002 Author: Rima Gougnina Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 13 Dec 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2008 Comment: On 13 JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1141/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1412/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal
Government comments on the fourth report on Portugal PRT 2013 03 21 2013 07 09 APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Portugal ECRI in accordance with its ECRIPRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=PRT-COM-IV-2013-020-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
Government comments on the fourth report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2010 04 28 2010 06 15 Government comments on the report on THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix ECRIMKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus
Government comments on the third report on Cyprus CYP 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Cyprus ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRICYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=CYP-COM-III-2006-017-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Malta
Government comments on the third report on Malta MLT 2007 12 14 2008 04 29 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Malta ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIMLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MLT-COM-III-2008-022-ENG
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010 Communication number s : 2013/2010 Author: Oleg Grishkovtsov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Dec 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: Imposition of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1915/en-US