Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2641 - 2660 of 2916
Conclusions 2020 - North Macedonia - Article 20
Conclusions 2020 North Macedonia Article 20 MKD 20 00 000 29/01/2021 01/02/2021 Article 20 Right to equal opportunities and equal treatment in matters of employment and occupation without discrimination on the grounds of sex The Committee takes note of ESC2020/def/MKD/20/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2020/def/MKD/20/EN
Conclusions 2020 - Romania - Article 24
Conclusions 2020 Romania Article 24 ROU 24 00 163 29/01/2021 04/02/2021 Article 24 Right to protection in case of dismissal The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Romania. Scope The Committee asks the next report ESC2020/def/ROU/24/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2020/def/ROU/24/EN
Conclusions 2020 - Slovak Republic - Article 20
Conclusions 2020 Slovak Republic Article 20 SVK 20 00 000 29/01/2021 01/02/2021 Article 20 Right to equal opportunities and equal treatment in matters of employment and occupation without discrimination on the grounds of sex The Committee takes note of ESC2020/def/SVK/20/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2020/def/SVK/20/EN
Conclusions 2021 - Ukraine - Article 3-2
Conclusions 2021 Ukraine Article 3 2 UKR 03 02 000 31/12/2021 31/01/2022 Article 3 Right to safe and healthy working conditions Paragraph 2 Safety and health regulations The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by ESC2021/def/UKR/3/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2021/def/UKR/3/2/EN
Conclusions XIX-4 - Croatia - Article 16-
Conclusions XIX 4 Croatia Article 16 HRV 16 00 000 09/12/2011 19/01/2012 Article 16 Right of the family to social legal and economic protection The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Croatia. As the notion of the ESCXIX-4/def/HRV/16//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIX-4/def/HRV/16//EN
Conclusions XIX-4 - Latvia - Article 16-
Conclusions XIX 4 Latvia Article 16 LVA 16 00 000 09/12/2011 19/01/2012 Article 16 Right of the family to social legal and economic protection The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Latvia. As the notion of the ESCXIX-4/def/LVA/16//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIX-4/def/LVA/16//EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons (ETS No. 112)
Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons ETS No. 112 112 Strasbourg 1983 03 21T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States COEETS No. 112https://rm.coe.int/1680079529
Cubrilov et al. v. Serbia
Cubrilov et al. v. Serbia CAT/C/72/D/939/2019 Communication number s : 939/2019 Author: Jasmina Cubrilov Jovic Milunka Cubrilov and Marina Cubrilov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Serbia Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of JUTBCAT/C/72/D/939/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3344/en-US
D.S. v. Slovakia
D.S. v. Slovakia CEDAW/C/65/D/66/2014 Communication number s : 66/2014 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 65 Country Slovakia Submission date 08 Feb 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/66/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3451/en-US
D.Č. v. Lithuania
D. . v. Lithuania CCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019 Communication number s : 3327/2019 Author: D. . Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2018 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3147/en-US
DA LUZ DOMINGUES FERREIRA v. Belgium
DA LUZ DOMINGUES FERREIRA v. Belgium BEL 24/08/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a trial due to the appeal court s refusal to reopen proceedings which had taken place in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1405
DAOUDI v. France
DAOUDI v. France FRA 03/03/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation of an Algerian national convicted of preparing an act of terrorism and using a froged document to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33075
DUBUS S.A. v. France
DUBUS S.A. v. France FRA 11/09/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: denial of a fair hearing due to the lack of independence and impartiality of disciplinary proceedings initiated by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33273
DVORSKI v. Croatia
DVORSKI v. Croatia HRV 20/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the denial without relevant and sufficient reasons of access to a lawyer of the suspect s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10141
Dafnis v. Greece
Dafnis v. Greece CCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020 Communication number s : 3740/2020 Author: Andreas Dafnis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Greece Submission date 20 Apr 2020 Date of decision 19 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3678/en-US
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark CERD/C/80/D/46/2009 Communication number s : 046/2009 Author: Mahali Dawas and Yousef Shava Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jun 2009 Date of decision 06 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/80/D/46/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1727/en-US
De Vos v. Netherlands
De Vos v. Netherlands CCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003 Communication number s : 1192/2003 Author: M. de Vos Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Netherlands Submission date 06 Aug 2002 Date of decision 25 Jul 2005 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/1192/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/982/en-US
Decision on the merits: Federation of employed pensioners of Greece (IKA-ETAM) v. Greece, Collective Complaint No. 76/2012
Decision on the merits: Federation of employed pensioners of Greece IKA ETAM v. Greece Collective Complaint No. 76/2012 GRC 12 00 000 12 03 000 07/12/2012 22/04/2013 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE ESCcc-76-2012-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-76-2012-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Panhellenic Federation of Public Service Pensioners (POPS) v. Greece, Collective Complaint No. 77/2012
Decision on the merits: Panhellenic Federation of Public Service Pensioners POPS v. Greece Collective Complaint No. 77/2012 GRC 12 03 000 07/12/2012 22/04/2013 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS ESCcc-77-2012-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-77-2012-dmerits-en