Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2901 - 2916 of 2916
VISIT TO BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE PROMOTION OF TRUTH, JUSTICE, REPARATION AND GUARANTEES OF NON-RECURRENCE
VISIT TO BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA :REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEUR ON THE PROMOTION OF TRUTH JUSTICE REPARATION AND GUARANTEES OF NON RECURRENCE A/HRC/51/34/ADD.2 NULL 2022 07 08T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation United Nations A/HRC/51/34/Add.2 General UHRIA/HRC/51/34/ADD.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/67ea4feb-6349-4ed5-8a39-62aaafcbe120
Vanchev v. Bulgaria
Vanchev v. Bulgaria CCPR/C/130/D/2820/2016 Communication number s : 2820/2016 Author: Mitko Vanchev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Bulgaria Submission date 27 Oct 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2820/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3270/en-US
Vincent v. France
Vincent v. France CCPR/C/91/D/1505/2006 Communication number s : 1505/2006 Author: Jean Pierre Vincent Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 91 Country France Submission date 20 Jul 2006 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1505/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1373/en-US
W.E.O. v. Sweden
W.E.O. v. Sweden CCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016 Communication number s : 2741/2016 Author: W.E.O. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 129 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Feb 2016 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2741/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2844/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002 Communication number s : 1086/2002 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Austria Submission date 24 May 2002 Date of decision 03 Apr 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of its rules JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/1086/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1048/en-US
Weiss v. Austria
Weiss v. Austria CCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008 Communication number s : 1821/2008 Author: Sholam Weiss Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Austria Submission date 12 May 2008 Date of decision 24 Oct 2012 Comment: Pursuant to rule 91 of JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1821/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1428/en-US
Working Group on Arbitrary Detention
Report to HRC A/HRC/10/21/Add.5 from 12 November 2008 to 14 November 2008 26 January 2009 Working Group on Arbitrary Detention Italy UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/10/21/Add.5 26 January 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL UNSPA/HRC/10/21/Add.5https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f10%2f21%2fAdd.5&Lang=en
Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances
Report to HRC A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 from 27 June 2014 to 30 June 2014 10 September 2018 Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances Montenegro United Nations A/HRC/39/46/Add.2 General Assembly Distr.: General 10 September 2018 English only Human UNSPA/HRC/39/46/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f39%2f46%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Working Group on discrimination against women and girls
State comment on Report A/HRC/35/29/Add.4 from 17 May 2016 to 27 May 2018 6 June 2017 Working Group on discrimination against women and girls Hungary United Nations A/HRC/35/29/Add.4 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 June 2017 English only Human Rights UNSPA/HRC/35/29/Add.4https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=A%2fHRC%2f35%2f29%2fAdd.4&Lang=en
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308
Y.R. v. Russian Federation
Y.R. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/72/D/869/2018 Communication number s : 869/2018 Author: Y.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Dec 2017 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/72/D/869/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3351/en-US
Zafar Abdullayev v. Turkmenistan
Zafar Abdullayev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/113/D/2218/2012 Communication number s : 2218/2012 Author: Zafar Abdullayev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2218/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1924/en-US
Zhanna Baytelova v. Kazakhstan
Zhanna Baytelova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2520/2015 Communication number s : 2520/2015 Author: Zhanna Baytelova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2015 Date of decision 22 Jul 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2520/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2859/en-US
Černáková v. Slovakia
ern kov v. Slovakia CAT/C/72/D/890/2018 Communication number s : 890/2018 Author: Lucia ern kov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Slovakia Submission date 10 Jul 2018 Date of decision 19 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/72/D/890/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3337/en-US