Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 2061 - 2069 of 2069
Z.H. v. Australia
Z.H. v. Australia CCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010 Communication number s : 1957/2010 Author: Z.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 107 Country Australia Submission date 14 Jul 2010 Date of decision 21 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1957/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1652/en-US
Z.Z. v. Canada
Z.Z. v. Canada CAT/C/26/D/123/1998 Communication number s : 123/1998 Author: Z.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 26 Country Canada Submission date 11 Nov 1998 Date of decision 15 May 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/26/D/123/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/203/en-US
Zündel v. Canada
Z ndel v. Canada CCPR/C/78/D/953/2000 Communication number s : 953/2000 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Canada Submission date 21 Aug 2000 Date of decision 27 Jul 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/953/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/955/en-US
ZIMBABWE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ZIMBABWE: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/ZWE/CO/5 11 NULL 2022 09 16T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/ZWE/CO/5 11 International Convention on Distr.: General 16 September 2022 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/ZWE/CO/5-11https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/e47d3578-bbec-420a-8b01-78b4024ab219
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007 Communication number s : 1585/2007 Author: Batyrova Zoolfia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 06 Jul 2007 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1521/en-US
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
Äärelä and Näkkäläjärvi v. Finland
rel and N kk l j rvi v. Finland CCPR/C/73/D/779/1997 Communication number s : 779/1997 Author: Anni rel and Jouni N kk l j rvi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Finland Submission date 04 Nov 1997 Date of decision 24 Oct 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/779/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/939/en-US
v. Austria
v. Austria CCPR/C/44/D/415/1990 Communication number s : 415/1990 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Austria Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCCPR/C/44/D/415/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1777/en-US
v. Switzerland
v. Switzerland CAT/C/52/D/481/2011 Communication number s : 481/2011 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Switzerland Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/481/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1836/en-US