Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1141 - 1160 of 1741
Cox v. Canada
Cox v. Canada CCPR/C/52/D/539/1993 Communication number s : 539/1993 Author: Keith Cox Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jan 1993 Date of decision 31 Oct 1994 Comment: 8 individual opinions were submitted JUTBCCPR/C/52/D/539/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/576/en-US
Cubrilov et al. v. Serbia
Cubrilov et al. v. Serbia CAT/C/72/D/939/2019 Communication number s : 939/2019 Author: Jasmina Cubrilov Jovic Milunka Cubrilov and Marina Cubrilov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Serbia Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of JUTBCAT/C/72/D/939/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3344/en-US
Cziklin v. Canada
Cziklin v. Canada CCPR/C/66/D/741/1997 Communication number s : 741/1997 Author: Michael Cziklin Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Canada Submission date 17 Apr 1996 Date of decision 27 Jul 1999 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/741/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/799/en-US
D.C. and D.E. v. Georgia
D.C. and D.E. v. Georgia CAT/C/60/D/573/2013 Communication number s : 573/2013 Author: D.C. and D.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Georgia Submission date 01 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/60/D/573/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3428/en-US
D.D. v. Spain
D.D. v. Spain CRC/C/80/D/4/2016 Communication number s : 004/2016 Author: D.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 26 Nov 2015 Date of decision 31 Jan 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/80/D/4/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2507/en-US
D.K.N. v. Spain
D.K.N. v. Spain CRC/C/80/D/15/2017 Communication number s : 015/2017 Author: D.K.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 13 Mar 2017 Date of decision 01 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/80/D/15/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2509/en-US
D.R. v. Australia
D.R. v. Australia CRPD/C/17/D/14/2013 Communication number s : 014/2013 Author: Philip French Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 17 Country Australia Submission date 14 Aug 2013 Date of decision 24 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/17/D/14/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2387/en-US
D.S. v. Australia
D.S. v. Australia CAT/C/73/D/941/2019 Communication number s : 941/2019 Author: D.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Australia Submission date 12 Jul 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/941/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3137/en-US
D.Y. v. Sweden
D.Y. v. Sweden CAT/C/50/D/463/2011 Communication number s : 463/2011 Author: D.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Sweden Submission date 30 May 2011 Date of decision 21 May 2013 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/50/D/463/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/12/en-US
D.Z. v. Netherlands
D.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016 Communication number s : 2918/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Nov 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3295/en-US
Déogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi
D ogratias Niyonzima v. Burundi CAT/C/53/D/514/2012 Communication number s : 514/2012 Author: D ogratias Niyonzima represented by Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Burundi Submission date 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCAT/C/53/D/514/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2058/en-US
D.Č. v. Lithuania
D. . v. Lithuania CCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019 Communication number s : 3327/2019 Author: D. . Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Lithuania Submission date 12 Sep 2018 Date of decision 24 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3327/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3147/en-US
DINK v. Turkey
DINK v. Turkey TUR 14/12/2010 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to freedom of expression on account of the conviction of the journalist and newspaper editor F rat Dink for denigrating Turkishness EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37184
DRR v. Switzerland
DRR v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/673/2015 Communication number s : 673/2015 Author: DRR represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Apr 2015 Date of decision 27 Apr 2018 Comment: Views non JUTBCAT/C/63/D/673/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2729/en-US
DRUZSTEVNI ZALOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
DRUZSTEVNI ZALOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/01/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property and Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Placement of a credit union in receivership without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6154
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
David v. Sweden
David v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/220/2002 Communication number s : 220/2002 Author: Ruben David Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Nov 2002 Date of decision 02 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/220/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/135/en-US
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark CERD/C/80/D/46/2009 Communication number s : 046/2009 Author: Mahali Dawas and Yousef Shava Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jun 2009 Date of decision 06 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/80/D/46/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1727/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy, Complaint No. 91/2013
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro CGIL v. Italy Complaint No. 91/2013 ITA 11 01 000 91 154 163 01 02 000 02 01 000 03 03 000 26 02 163 2015 10 12 2016 04 11 European Committee of Social Rights Comit ESCcc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation LO and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees TCO v. Sweden Complaint No. 85/2012 SWE 06 02 000 06 04 000 19 04 000 03/07/2013 05/02/2014 European Committee of Social ESCcc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-en