Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 541 - 556 of 556
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS NLD 2013 06 21 2013 07 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY NOR 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIC
Fifth Evaluation Round Compliance Report Belgium
Fifth Evaluation Round Compliance Report Belgium BEL 2021 12 03 2022 01 21 Adoption : 3 December 2021 Publication : 21 January 2022 Public GrecoRC5 2021 11 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top GRECOGrecoRC5(2021)11-Final-eng-Compliancereport-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC5(2021)11-Final-eng-Compliancereport-Belgium-PUBLIC
First Opinion on Croatia
First Opinion on Croatia HRV ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 003 2001 04 06 2002 02 06 Strasbourg 6 February 2002 ACFC/INF/OP/I 2002 003 Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Opinion on Croatia adopted on 6 April 2001 FCNMACFC/INF/OP/I(2002)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=1st_OP_Croatia_en
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT BELGIUM
Fourth Evaluation Round Corruption prevention in respect of members ofparliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT BELGIUM BEL 2016 10 21 2017 01 11 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Belgian authorities to GRECOGrecoRC4-2016-9-en-Final-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2016-9-en-Final-Belgium-PUBLIC
Fourth Opinion on Ukraine
Fourth Opinion on Ukraine UKR ACFC/OP/IV 2017 002 2017 03 10 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/OP/IV 2017 002 Fourth Opinion on Ukraine adopted on 10 March 2017 Published on 5 March 2018 Summary FCNMACFC/OP/IV(2017)002https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=4th_OP_Ukraine_public_en
Fourth report on Ireland
Fourth report on Ireland IRL 2012 12 05 2013 02 19 CRI 2013 1 ECRI REPORT ON IRELAND fourth monitoring cycle Adopted on 5 December 2012 Published on 19 February 2013 ECRI Secretariat Directorate General II Democracy Council of Europe F 67075 STRASBOURG ECRIIRL-CbC-IV-2013-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=IRL-CbC-IV-2013-001-ENG
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
K.J. v. Lithuania
K.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015 Communication number s : 2674/2015 Author: K.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3296/en-US
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan
NAMAZOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case of Namazov concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private life on account of his disbarment in 2011 2012 in the absence of adequate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55353
NEDESCU v. Romania
NEDESCU v. Romania ROU 16/04/2018 00:00:00 15/03/2019 16:06:37 Case Description: The case concerns the continuing impossibility for the applicants to recover their frozen embryos seized by the prosecuting authorities in 2009 in a criminal investigation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49399
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan
RAMAZANOVA AND OTHERS v. Azerbaijan AZE 01/05/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of of the right to freedom of association on account of the authorities a unlawful de facto refusals to register the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1607
Sonia Yaker v. France
Sonia Yaker v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016 Communication number s : 2747/2016 Author: Sonia Yaker Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 22 Feb 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: The following are JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2547/en-US
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic
Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic SVK ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 2010 05 28 Strasbourg 18 January 2011 Public ACFC/OP/III 2010 004 ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Third Opinion on the Slovak Republic FCNMACFC/OP/III(2010)004https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=3rd_OP_SlovakRepublic_en
V. v. Denmark
V. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013 Communication number s : 57/2013 Author: V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Aug 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/57/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3030/en-US