Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 41
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ARMANI DA SILVA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5878/08 WISTRICH H. GBR 3/30/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect Offences under the Health and Safety at Work ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161975
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF BUJAK v. POLAND
CASE OF BUJAK v. POLAND 686/12 SLUPSKA UCZKIEWICZ B. POL 3/21/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0321JUD000068612https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172103
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY
CASE OF CYPRUS v. TURKEY 25781/94 TUR 5/12/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction 567 197 14 216 577 283 26 1 126 214 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0512JUD002578194https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144151
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF FAYED v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 17101/90 N/A GBR 9/21/1994 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Companies Act 1985 Sections 432 para. 2 434 436 437 para. 3 c 14 128 445 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0921JUD001710190https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57890
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POHARNOK B. HUN 3/14/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 f Expulsion Prevent unauthorised entry into country Violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-172091
CASE OF LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LIBERTY AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58243/00 GASK A. GBR 7/1/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Sections 1 10 of the Interception of Communications Act 1985 Sections 2 5 and 16 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701JUD005824300https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-87207
CASE OF LUSTIG-PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF LUSTIG PREAN AND BECKETT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 31417/96 32377/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 Just satisfaction reserved Army Act 1955 Air Force Act 1955 Naval Discipline Act 1957 Sexual ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58407
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 1)
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 1 6538/74 N/A GBR 4/26/1979 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 14 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved 149 148 201 316 265 379 343 100 232 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:0426JUD000653874https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57584
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 66069/09 130/10 3896/10 CREIGHTON S. WEATHERBY P. VAN ZYL SMIT D. WOODS B. HORWELL R. HINDMARSH L. CHIVERS SOLICITORS BINGLEY McKONE M. GBR 7/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122664
CASE OF X v. LATVIA
CASE OF X v. LATVIA 27853/09 STRAUSS R. LVA 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for family life Section 644 of the Latvian Civil Procedure Act 451 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD002785309https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138992
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT DENMARK
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT DENMARK DNK 2014 03 28 2014 04 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-6E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-6E-Final-Denmark-PUBLIC
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand
Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 Communication number s : 2728/2016 Author: Ioane Teitiota Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country New Zealand Submission date 15 Sep 2015 Date of decision 24 Oct 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2798/en-US
Malcolm John Richards v. New Zealand
Malcolm John Richards v. New Zealand CAT/C/73/D/934/2019 Communication number s : Author: Malcolm John Richards Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country New Zealand Submission date 13 Mar 2018 Date of decision 12 May 2022 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/73/D/934/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3756/en-US
New Zealand’s human rights record to be reviewed by Universal Periodic Review
GENEVA 16 January 2019 New Zealands human rights record will be examined by the UN Human Rights Council s Universal Periodic Review UPR Working Group for the third time on Monday 21 January 2019 in a meeting that will be webcast live. New Zealand is one UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/media-advisories/2019/01/new-zealands-human-rights-record-be-reviewed-universal-periodic-review