Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 665
2nd RC4 Spain
2nd RC4 Spain ESP 2021 03 25 2021 09 30 I. INTRODUCTION The Fourth Round Evaluation Report on Spain was adopted at GRECO s 62nd Plenary Meeting 6 December 2013 and made public on 15 January 2014 following authorisation by Spain. The Fourth Evaluation GRECOGrecoRC4(2021)3-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4%282021%293-Final-eng-Spain-PUBLIC
A.A.S. v. Denmark
A.A.S. v. Denmark CCPR/C/117/D/2464/2014 Communication number s : 2464/2014 Author: A.A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Oct 2014 Date of decision 04 Jul 2016 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2464/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2224/en-US
A.H. and S.H. v. France
A.H. and S.H. v. France CAT/C/73/D/933/2019 Communication number s : 933/2019 Author: A.H. and S.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country France Submission date 14 May 2019 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/73/D/933/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3335/en-US
A/HRC/47/6/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania Addendum
United Nations A/HRC/47/6/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 19 April 2021 English Original: French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
A.P. v. Russian Federation
A.P. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008 Communication number s : 1857/2008 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 May 2008 Date of decision 28 Mar 2013 Comment: The JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1857/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1326/en-US
ABENAVOLI v. Italy
ABENAVOLI v. Italy ITA 02/09/1997 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: The Abenavoli group of cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before the administrative courts since the 1990s violations of Article 6 1 . Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28186
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia
Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia CCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015 Communication number s : 2537/2015 Author: Andr s Felipe Arias Leiva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Colombia Submission date 11 Aug 2014 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2537/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2501/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 NULL 2019 12 06T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 International Covenant on Distr.: General 6 December 2019 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BEL/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/943606ba-aac7-4b1e-9f9b-ec5c020ce60b
BRAZIL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BRAZIL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CERD/C/BRA/CO/18 20 NULL 2022 12 07T00:00:00 CERD United Nations CERD/C/BRA/CO/18 20 International Convention on Distr.: General 19 December 2022 the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination Original: English UHRICERD/C/BRA/CO/18-20https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9955cd8a-1e66-4dd6-a2b6-7aac5a0d1d93
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
Bibaud v. Canada
Bibaud v. Canada CCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008 Communication number s : 1747/2008 Author: Mireille Boisvert Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Canada Submission date 23 Jul 2008 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1747/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1577/en-US
Brun v. France
Brun v. France CCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006 Communication number s : 1453/2006 Author: Andr Brun Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country France Submission date 15 Nov 2005 Date of decision 18 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of the JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1453/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1319/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A.D.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 35765/97 N/A GBR 7/31/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage financial award Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award Sexual Offences Act 1956 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0731JUD003576597https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58922
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA
CASE OF A.E. v. BULGARIA 53891/20 DOBREVA N. BGR 5/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD005389120https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-224778
CASE OF A.S.N. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.S.N. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 68377/17 530/18 VAN HAREN F.L.M. NLD 2/25/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Afghanistan 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717 FOURTH ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006837717https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-201330