Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1081 - 1086 of 1086
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
YAVASHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the applicants right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Impossibility for the applicants to apply for compensation for a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14465
Yashar Agazade v. Azerbaijan
Yashar Agazade v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/126/D/2307/2013 Communication number s : 2307/2013 Author: Yashar Agazade Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 06 Nov 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2307/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2793/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.B. v. Hungary
Z.B. v. Hungary CCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016 Communication number s : 2768/2016 Author: Z.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Hungary Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2538/en-US
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The cases 1 of this group concern the long lasting moratorium on the alienation of agricultural land found by the Court to be in violation of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50173
Zapescu v. Republic of Moldova
Zapescu v. Republic of Moldova CERD/C/103/D/60/2016 Communication number s : 60/2016 Author: Grigore Zapescu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Republic of Moldova Submission date 30 Jun 2016 Date of decision 22 Apr 2021 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/103/D/60/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3023/en-US